Wikipedia:Featured article review/Mount Pinatubo/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 23:35, 28 March 2010 [1].
Mount Pinatubo[edit]
Review commentary[edit]
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified:WikiProject Volcanoes
I am nominating this featured article for review because it is no more a FA per current criteria. Extensively uncited. A photo gallery at the end. External links not properly formatted etc. etc. As I saw, the user who nominate the article is no more active.Yannismarou (talk) 00:06, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Please add alt text to images; see WP:ALT. Eubulides (talk) 00:16, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Boldly removed the photo gallery, which I felt contributed nothing. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:16, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Media review
- File:Pinatubo_evacuation_areas.gif: it's best to give a link or publication details for the original source for the image. In this case, particularly because the evacuation zones may have been slightly more complicated than this. Specifically, the areas at greatest risk (because they were on particularly prone slopes of the volcano) may have been given greater priority, or areas that were sheltered (by intervening high ground for example) may have been given less priority. I'm not certain the evacuation zones were as clearcut as concentric circles.
- File:VulcanoPinatuboJune1991.gif: source is a broken link (and not USGS). DrKiernan (talk) 09:42, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, I'm willing to take this on; I'll need time however. I'll browse through what's currently there for now. ceranthor 21:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - This article needs a lot more inline citations for verification. BT (talk) 17:31, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I've moved it down as there were only a few ref fmt tweaks, maybe an hour's worth of work. Ceranthor, no need to panic YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary[edit]
- Featured article criterion of concern are referencing, MOS/linkfarm, images YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 00:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per severe lack of citations, but this will probably change if Ceran takes it on. —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 02:35, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. A purported list of sources used in the writing of the article can be found on the talk page. The task will then be matching statements in the article with the appropriate source. Lambanog (talk) 21:21, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist due to extreme citation shortage. Entire sections 'The area since 1991', 'Global environmental effects' and 'Local economic and social effects' lacking inline citations.--Guanlong wucaii 15:28, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist for lack of sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, virtually unreferenced. Arsenikk (talk) 22:32, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.