User talk:Yellow Swans

Speedy deletion nomination of Wang NewOne

Hello Yellow Swans,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wang NewOne for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Julietdeltalima (talk) 00:09, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Just an update that I've added more references and within a day a different user removed the Speedy Deletion tag! This is one of the first articles I've created and I see it's important to put more references early on. Yellow Swans (talk) 07:49, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 5 March

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Wang NewOne page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Update: fixed it promptly. Yellow Swans (talk) 07:50, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Awesome Tapes From Africa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Awesome Tapes From Africa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awesome Tapes From Africa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:47, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Wang NewOne for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wang NewOne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang NewOne until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zanhe (talk) 23:17, 30 March 2016 (UTC)