User talk:Starship.paint/Archive 11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5 ← Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 → Archive 15

Answer.

Main event winner gets huge pop, cheered onto Today Show. Certain little men can beat certain big men at WrestleMania. Bryan was clearly better off curtain-jerking, though. Finally, the Intercontinental Title has come back to a pro wrestler.

You can be 100% sure and still wrong. Happens to the best of us, though!

Instead of football like XI, we got MMA crossover. I assume the pop and the common enemy answers your question about whether Rousey is cool. Carlito wouldn't spit in her face.

Who should WWE book to beat Lesnar? Nobody, probably. Where are Rowan and Harper now? Harper had a nice spot tonight. I missed the pre-show, Rowan might have been visible.

I think that about answers everything from my talk page. WWE didn't screw up, and wrestling is awesome again, at least for a while. Yay! InedibleHulk (talk) 03:49, March 30, 2015 (UTC)

And yay Rowan! He did show up. InedibleHulk (talk) 03:51, March 30, 2015 (UTC)
  • @InedibleHulk: - I still would have preferred Lesnar retaining, but Reigns not winning was a huge relief. I think WWE screwed up on Mizdow though - for an intellectual savior, he wasn't very smart, and his character wasn't consistent in other ways as well IMO. Rowan - jobs to Big Show ... again. Harper? Haven't seen him yet. But at the end of the day, WWE didn't get their main event wrong. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 11:50, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
I think we can call him Sandow again. At least, that'd make sense. I didn't see the match, but think Show made sense. About time a giant wins the sort of match commentators pretend giants are good at. Sandow has a bright future, with or without it.
Harper was actually more important than I'd realized at first. By killing Ambrose, who swore he'd stop Rollins from cashing, he made a main event assist. Not sure if Ambrose is legit hurt, but it looked painful. Also smashed Stardust, which really accomplished nothing, but looked nice.
Definitely one of the best WrestleManias, in my book. InedibleHulk (talk) 13:43, March 30, 2015 (UTC)
I tried to not spoil much. Didn't say how he killed them. InedibleHulk (talk) 13:53, March 30, 2015 (UTC)
  • @InedibleHulk: Think you were fooled by JBL's bad commentary. Harper only killed Ambrose. It was Barrett that took out Stardust twice. Illogical that Ziggler's sleeper (long since ceased to be a finisher) took out Harper for over two minutes. Made no sense for Ziggler to recover from a Bull Hammer when Stardust and Truth didn't. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 00:03, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
It wasn't JBL, it was my own aging brain, but yeah, my bad. Looked nice, Barrett. I definitely remember getting pissed when Ziggler came back, fresh as a daisy. Then the Curb Stomp and RKO didn't work. Then the Pedigree and Scorpion Deathlock. Sister Abigail? Nope. Tombstone? Nope. Accolade, AA? Nope.
Maybe if kicking out finishers wasn't so damn easy, Reigns would've looked tough for all those F5s. But since it is, he just looked like another guy, but one who couldn't get in nearly as much offense. The commentators tried to fool me about that, but it didn't work either. InedibleHulk (talk) 03:53, March 31, 2015 (UTC)
  • @InedibleHulk: Hilarious that Reigns kicked out of the third F5 ... when the Undertaker didn't. I didn't see all those you mentioned, wasn't interested. Nikki's Rack Attack also didn't work, I read. But I concur. Finishers should be one and done. Hiroshi Tanahashi vs Kazuchika Okada III, which had finisher kick-outs, was poorer than Tanahashi-Okada IV, which didn't. If an AA was kicked out of, why would Cena's diving leg drop bulldog result in the win? Further more, one finisher kick-out practically guarantees the other person kicking out too - case in point, the post-Mania Raw - Ambrose kicks out of an AA, so you know Cena will kick out of Dirty Deeds. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 13:12, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

WrestleZone

Uh... I never used WrestleZone for that information regarding the logo on WrestleMania 31. Why are you blaming me for using it? TheMeaningOfBlah (talk) 14:51, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

This was also accidental. Meant to change the URL, too. Thanks for catching it. InedibleHulk (talk) 15:18, March 30, 2015 (UTC)
  • I actually overrode your edit without reading it due to an edit conflict. Sorry. All's well that ends well. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 23:59, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amos Yee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Today (newspaper). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks and sorry

Thanks for your DYK review of Mark Hulbert. Unfortunately I didn't realize how complicated the process was so I had to withdraw. Apologies for the churn. I did fix most of the issues. SageGreenRider (talk) 11:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Amos Yee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amos Yee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amos Yee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. nonsense ferret 14:28, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Garissa University College attack

In accordance with your message, I am trying to have a discussion but the other fellow reverts without discussing the issue. See the discussion page.120.62.24.165 (talk) 05:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Can you please address the edit war issue?

on Garissa University College attack. We're going nowhere fast. SyriaWarLato (talk) 06:18, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for keeping conversation at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amos Yee respectful, thoughtful, and engaging. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Thank you @Bluerasberry:. I'm still trying to wrap my head around your "other cultures" comment. Don't totally understand. But if you were trying to calm me down, then thanks again. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 22:51, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

WWE response to Justin Robert's but hurt blog

http://www.wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/2015/0403/592130/wwe-issues-response-to-justin-roberts-blog-on-connor-michalek/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.254.48.216 (talk) 16:29, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

I've read it before, 96. Unreliable source though starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 12:18, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Precious again

ultimate warrior
Thank you for your work for project professional wrestling, for quality articles, putting your money in the bank of extreme rules, for gnomish work on quality with entertaining edit summaries, for remembering The Ultimate Warrior and wrestling for fairness, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:24, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 826th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:07, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

see my talk - I am fine, working on a FAC, but three friends left during the last weeks, and editing Maria Radner was tough, - how about you and your break? - I am the most restricted person in the infobox field now (that Andy received relief from the kafkaesque restriction not to design his "own" articles), which amuses me greatly, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:28, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Wow, I'm really amazed that article younger than one-month is GA already. Nice! I cut my watchlist from at least 250 to now 35. Phew. But I really need to stay away for the next three weeks. I saw the last AE against you, lucky nothing happened! starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 12:54, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
That article was a wonderful collaboration (I did little) - GA and DYK almost simultaneously, + Wesendonck Lieder improved. Btw, the prose was questioned, and is of course uneven, with so many editors involved, - you are welcome to improve. - AE: It must have been very harassing that I laughed loud about a revert of an infobox in an article Andy had created, after all this talk about the "Main editors", and I will not forget the remark "The live editing of featured article seems not such a good idea" ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:13, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Precious again, today's Money in the Bank (2011)! - My last was 7 June ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:41, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Your welcome

I'm always glad to help! 173.246.7.65 (talk) 05:23, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Seth Rollins

Explain the Rollins thing to me, because I have proof, I just don't know what it is you were talking about. --Evil Yugi (talk) 19:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Invitation

I'd like to invite you to join the WikiProject R&B and Soul Music. We are currently on demand for new members, the project was dying, but with your help we can revive it and make it one of the best WikiProjects. Make me sure that you'll think about this and remember cooperative works can do amazing things. Regards Dfrr (talk) 17:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

The thing is

Discussing how boring the Diva's division in WWE is now with AJ Lee gone now, could be considered a 'gender controversy'. Gotta at least fight to see it narrowed, not everything GG is about ZQ and not everything gender controversy is about GG. Ranze (talk) 06:54, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Amos Yee DYK

Hello! Your submission at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 001Jrm (talk) 05:28, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Shooting of Dontre Hamilton

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Shooting of Dontre Hamilton. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Milwaukee_Police_Department#Dontre_Hamilton. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Milwaukee_Police_Department#Dontre_Hamilton – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ― Padenton|✉   13:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Amos Yee

PanydThe muffin is not subtle 07:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Neville (wrestler)

An official move request as opened for this if you wold like to add your views https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Pac_(wrestler)#Requested_move_25_April_2015 78.148.127.93 (talk) 23:58, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Your question at AE

I noticed your concern here. The work on page-level restrictions did not hijack the discussion. I did indeed review the diffs in context. Because the behavior was reviewed and the request is now closed, it would not be appropriate for you to re-open essentially the same request again. Thanks... Zad68 14:15, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Lives

@Grand'mere Eugene, Borock, Buffaboy, Freidnless lnoner, Dimadick, OrbitHawk, and Roscelese: Though the page was deleted, all is not lost. See Black Lives Matter#Inspiring cases. Still a work in progress, though, we can continue to add cases as long as sources exist connecting them to BLM. Here is the full table before deletion. starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 07:26, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Deaths inspiring Black Lives Matter

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Deaths inspiring Black Lives Matter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ― Padenton|✉   18:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Wrestle Kingdom 9

Harrias talk 19:17, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Deaths inspiring Black Lives Matter

Template:Deaths inspiring Black Lives Matter has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. - MrX 20:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of deaths inspiring Black Lives Matter

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of deaths inspiring Black Lives Matter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ― Padenton|✉   14:59, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

ITN recognition for S. R. Nathan

On 23 August 2016, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article S. R. Nathan, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Starship.paint/Archive_11&oldid=1139337300"