User talk:Snowwhiteunger

May 2015

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Le Sage's theory of gravitation, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 09:52, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia:Consensus process was damaged by launching SPI against only those editors who were in favor of including DoNotGod's link. Allegations were proven false.

Note

The admins have every right to suspect you of meat puppetry. Your very first edit was based on the very user that was blocked for the issue. No actual apology is needed.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 13:39, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

That's not my very first edit on Wikipedia. I tried logging in under my preexisting account, but lost the password. This edit is, in fact, mine: Special:Contributions/Snowwhitefan1. The graceful solution imo, would be an apology. Snowwhiteunger (talk) 13:48, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

That edit was removed and was nearly two years ago. Which still holds a good indication of meat puppetry if you come back to defend the blocked user.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 13:53, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out the edit was made nearly two years ago, which necessarily means I'm not a newbie (yet another false allegation). It also shoots the meatpuppet allegation out of the water. I'm defending myself against serious false allegations. Snowwhiteunger (talk) 14:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

It was one useless edit (reverted within the hour) and than you stopped for two years. In the talk pages when you defended DoNotGod, you even say you are new to Wikipedia. Nice try, but I research before I release my suspicions.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 15:14, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Snowwhiteunger, please don't fall into TheGracefulSlick's trap. He's a paranoid, obsessive little person who will stalk you and call in the lynchmob to take you out. He's already trying to by invoking WP:BOOMERANG at WP:AN/I. It's best to leave the troll be and go about your business. 2A02:C200:0:10:2:1:2003:1 (talk) 15:29, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

I had an entirely reasonable, logical reply typed out before spotting your warning. If the user you mention is really willing to go to those lengths to "win" a dispute on Wikipedia, then he might as well go ahead and declare victory. Moving forward with this isn't worth it to me. Thanks for the tip. Snowwhiteunger (talk) 16:30, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Nice rant on AN/I, anyways I will be around in case you need help. I remember when I was a newbie, such as yourself, and other users assisting me was so worth while. Hopefully you can put this rather ugly start behind you.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 17:27, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Aww...thanks for the kind words. Glad you could weigh-in with such an intelligent choice of diction.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2015 (UTC)