User talk:Reaper Eternal/Archive 36

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 30 ← Archive 34 Archive 35 Archive 36 Archive 37

Revertion of my speedy deletion nomination

there is a draft article called "When will we run out of" and it is a weird article. It talks about running out of wheat or something. So I tried to nominate is for SD because it is nonsense and you reverted it because it is a draft. I understand that, but what should we do with the article now? It will get declined but I mostly am asking this because if this happens to me again, I don't know what to do in a situation like this haha. Bigeshjen (talk) 18:47, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Bigeshjen

G1 doesn't apply to Drafts? Are you sure? -- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
G1 doesn't apply to drafts in progress, or drafts actively being edited would constantly be deleted. The draft namespace is intended to give editors space to develop their articles, but, obviously, it is also not a sandbox for editing tests or gibberish (G2 or G1 applies here). However, users unfamiliar with wikitext will often include broken formatting in their articles (that they later remove) which can appear like editing tests or gibberish.
In this case, the article had next to no content other than the following statement: "The world is on course to run out of wheat by August 2022 due to the Ukrainian war." This is a reference to this news article. While this probably does not merit its own Wikipedia article, the content is valid and could potentially be included in an article on the Ukraine-Russia war. It is not gibberish, and it is certainly not vandalism (courtesy pings to Anthony Bradbury and LPS and MLP Fan). The only reason this article might look like gibberish was the editor had a random table in the article, probably accidentally due to the aforementioned lack of knowledge of wikitext.
I'm going to be honest here: You guys were rather bitey, and the CSD deletion for "vandalism" was flat-out wrong.
In the future, Bigeshjen, you might want to wait a bit before tagging and/or approach the author and ask them what they're talking about. Reaper Eternal (talk) 04:52, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello there. I am replying in this conversation because I was pinged. Thank you for the clarification of G1's application; I did not find anything about it being inapplicable to drafts in progress in WP:G1. The draft I tagged for deletion, along with a few other drafts I tagged under G3, got deleted by Anthony Bradbury.
Next, I would like to explain why I did this. I was patrolling recent changes when I came across edits to Draft:A Towel By Another Name. Recognizing that the draft consisted of pure vandalism, I tagged it for deletion. Then, I went to Special:NewPages to look for other inappropriate drafts. I found a lot of drafts that had problems (more when I was going through new pages to find the drafts I encountered), such as the subject's inherent lack of notability or providing no context about the subject. I wasn't sure about what to do with those because the speedy deletion criteria they satisfy only applies to articles, so I did not tag them with G1, G2, etc. However, I filed an MfD for Draft:A YOUNG SINGER/RAPPING/HIP HOP ARTIST reece.
In my opinion, I think those drafts I encountered, including the one Bigeshjen originally tagged, are not going to be edited after a few edits. As an editor who specializes in anti-vandalism, I naturally want to get rid of inappropriate pages. I know I could wait for G13 to apply, but I think I do not want to wait for six months for the problematic drafts to be deleted.
After reading your reply, I think that you were right that it was wrong to tag the subject draft for deletion under G3, even if it did not make much sense to me. LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 14:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
..and completely unrelated, but holy shizz Reaper, you must have used up an entire years' worth of CU pixie dust at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Custodi2! I need a nap just thinking about it.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 23:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm thinking it was a paid editing farm. That wasted a couple hours of my evening.... Reaper Eternal (talk) 04:53, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
Way to take one for the team! Regarding the G1 bit, I would have declined as well because it wasn't patent nonsense, but your comment that G1 didn't apply to drafts threw me for a loop. Thought I'd interpreted it wrong all this time and may have deleted some drafts out of process at some point. Anyhoo, back to the grind.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:48, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

User:Oyoin/Sample page‎

I'm usually pretty lax with user sandboxes, but a sandbox that is just to change part of the sample text to "CUNT"? I thought G3 would apply to that, but it's not a hill I'm going to die on (it is a user page at the end of the day). Singularity42 (talk) 16:03, 22 June 2022 (UTC)e

I've removed the profanity. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Now they are trolling me and/or personally attacking me: [1]. Joy. Singularity42 (talk) 16:16, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Sigh. I guess he just wants to be a troll. Well, trolls aren't welcome here, so I have blocked him indefinitely. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:11, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:32, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Reviewing my case

Hi, Reaper Eternal. I didn't know where to post this, as the SPI has been closed. I also usually don't post at this time, but I was busy earlier and, due to the nature of the latest comment at the SPI page,[2] I thought I should post soon instead of waiting. You and RoySmith are the two CUs who seem to have considered the CU and behavioural evidence in the most recent Daner's Creek SPI investigations. A concern that Johnuniq is involved and leans toward me not being a sock has been entered. You may have seen that I entered a concern that evidence has been shared with two admins who lean in the other direction.[3] Tamzin was specifically pinged to an ANI thread about me because of this belief.[4] So I wouldn't think it compromises things if Johnuniq were also allowed to review the evidence. He has also asked about reviewing the evidence before blocking.[5]

That said, as you and RoySmith seem to be the most neutral reviewing the case, would it not be reasonable to put in this request that Tamzin pass the new behavioural evidence over to you and RoySmith so that you can also review it, if you're willing? I've been through a thorough CU analysis, it seems, and a thorough behavioural analysis. And now the user who pinged Tamzin has thrown in more information to review after the results were not the ones they wanted. RoySmith's comment here[6] reflects my view of the SPI, that there's more and more pressing so that the outcome ends with me blocked. At this point, I'd probably request an unblock if blocked. But I'd rather the evidence be reviewed by neutral participants before, not after. The burden of evidence to prove I'm not a sock seems unusually higher than it is for other sock cases, and "no, not a sock" appears to be the unacceptable answer. I feel like I'm stepping on the shells of eggs and can't say anything about this case without getting blocked, and that even asking this will be considered disruptive.

If you and RoySmith would prefer to ignore this post because of the heat the SPI has attracted, I'll understand. GBFEE (talk) 04:55, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Since I was pinged, I will note: Once I'm done with my analysis, whatever I find, the results will be available to any admin or SPI clerk on request. Currently that analysis is being delayed due to some technical issues. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 05:09, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
One concern I have is others not having the chance to review before you make the decision to block or not, if you choose that. Leaving the choice in the hands of one admin after CU and behavioural evidence have already come back negative or lacking hard evidence seems to be a very unusual process. Because of your previous statements on the topic, it's concerning to me for a similar reason it would be concerning to others if the decision were unilaterally Johnuniq's and he said there was no evidence based on his analysis. GBFEE (talk) 05:22, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
I would not block you without consulting with other admins. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 07:09, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
I only ask that the pool of reviewing admins consist of more than those who take a hard stance that I'm a sock. That's why I've asked for Reaper Eternal and RoySmith to also review. Ultimately, how much more hands-on they want to be with the case is their decision. GBFEE (talk) 21:27, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
To clarify, I have not expressed an opinion about who is or who isn't a sock. That's because I don't know and have not had the time or energy to fully investigate. Those at the SPI who question my INVOLVED status also seem to think I have a view, but that's not correct. I have a long familiarity with Flyer's editing and have been dismayed that recent aspersions have been unchallenged. For an important case like this, it's not satisfactory to block anyone for "disruption" without precise examples of the problem (or a link to where the examples are shown). Also, any sock tells that can be revealed in public should be. I understand that it is often undesirable to give a full public explanation concerning why someone has been blocked as a sock but I hope that those discussing non-public evidence consider that perceived similarities can have innocent explanations, as I mentioned at the SPI. I would be happy to review evidence, if admins want that. Johnuniq (talk) 05:37, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Johnuniq, I don't think you were being non-neutral. I think you were being objective. But since there's opinions that take a different view of your participation, I used that as a comparison above. Thank you for offering your assessments. GBFEE (talk) 21:27, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Remove personal info

Hi!

Liked your username the most out of the list, so hereby a request for personal information deletion.

Could you delete the revision on my page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Larcorba where my full name is visible? Thanks a lot!Larcorba (talk) 14:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!

Best wishes, Chris Troutman (talk) 14:04, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Have a Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Hey there Reaper Eternal, I'd like to wish you a happy adminship anniversary! Congratulations on your special day, and thank you for all the contributions you've made.

LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 19:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC) On behalf of the Birthday Committee

The Signpost: 1 August 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 August 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Correction to previous election announcement

Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I (Hog Farm) didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon

Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 September 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Deleting old, offensive revision history on my personal page.

Hi Brian, I am requesting deletion of older versions of my user page. About 17 years ago I had been dealing with a colleague who was leaving offensive posts all over the early social media, and was making changes to my page. Recently this history was brought to my attention by a friend.

The two offensive history entries are posted by the IP address 205.188.116.66 and they appear to meet the Wikipedia:Revision deletion criteria.

I'm not skilled in Wikipedia to be honest, so pardon me if this request isn't following the right protocol. Motorbikematt (talk) 05:43, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, that's pretty offensive, so I've removed both edits. Your request is fine—there's no fixed protocol for requesting removal of obscene content like that. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:09, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

Rachel Chaikof notability: 12 October 2022

Hi there! Thanks for the info on speedy deletion in the living person biography about Rachel Chaikof. In your reversal, you pointed out that there are "reliable sources" in the article.

That's true, but my reading of the criteria on speedy deletion seems to require not only reliable-source citations, but also requires significance (or notability).

"This applies to any article...that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.... This is distinct from verifiability and reliability of sources... The criterion does apply if the claim of significance or importance given is not credible." Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#A7 (emphasis mine)

While there are indeed citations, in cleaning up the article, it became clear that the claim of significance or importance is not credible. The only significance of the subject I was able to verify through citations was winning a middle-school science fair, having a photo taken for a poster, and having a common genetic disease.

I'd request you replace the speedy deletion template. If you don't agree, I'm happy to go through the WP:AFD process. Thanks again!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kerri9494 (talk • contribs)

(Discussion continued at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Chaikof.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:11, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Please Block ip vandal

Please block vandal ip address 219.78.77.203 has repeatedly vandalised the Hakkas wikipage by going against WP:NOETHNICGALLERIES. Hakkameizhow (talk) 04:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Noting that Hakkameizhow has shopped this request around. This IP may eventually need a disruption block, but Hakkameizhow has failed to warn or inform the IP editor of the MOS issue and inappropriately reverts it as vandalism. See my talk for more. -- ferret (talk) 13:23, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors' October 2022 newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors October 2022 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to our latest newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.

Drive: Of the 22 editors who signed up for our July Backlog Elimination Drive, 18 copy-edited, between them, 116 articles. Barnstars awarded are noted here.

Blitz: Participants in our August Copy Editing Blitz copy-edited 51,074 words in 17 articles. Of the 15 editors who signed up, 11 claimed at least one copy-edit. Barnstars awarded are noted here.

Drive: Forty-one editors took part in our September Backlog Elimination Drive; between them they copy-edited 199 articles. Barnstars awards are noted here.

Blitz: Our October Copy Editing Blitz begins on 16 October at 00:01 (UTC) and will end on 22 October at 23:59 (UTC). Barnstars awarded will be posted here.

Progress report: As of 19:57, 12 October 2022 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 303 requests for copy edit – including withdrawn and declined ones – since 1 January. At the time of writing, there are 77 requests awaiting attention and the backlog of tagged articles stands at 1,759. We always need more active, skilled copyeditors – particularly for requests – so please get involved if you can.

Election news: In our mid-year election, serving coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg and Tenryuu were returned for another term, and were joined by new coordinator Zippybonzo. No lead coordinator was elected for this half-year. Jonesey95, a long-serving coordinator and lead, was elected as coordinator emeritus; we thank them for their service. Thank you to everyone who took part. Our next election of coordinators takes place throughout December. If you'd like to help out at the GOCE, please consider nominating yourself or other suitable editors (with their permission, of course!). It's your Guild, after all!

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Reidgreg, Tenryuu and Zippybonzo.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Baffle☿gab 03:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Peepeepoopoo

Hey Reaper--you make filters? Please see my block log; it seems to me that these two are the same person, using proxies or whatever. I don't know how they got to create accounts with those names, but it'd be great if they could be stopped. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 01:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

  • I don't know if it's the same dick that messing with History of Burnley F.C. but it might as well be. Drmies (talk) 02:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
    Because accounts are no longer created locally, MediaWiki:Titleblacklist can no longer be used to stop clearly-inappropriate usernames. Only the global title blacklist at meta can stop them. I'm not convinced these accounts are related, since "pee", "420", "69", and "poo" are just common schoolyard vandalism names. That said, they're obviously not here to be constructive. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:54, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

GA review of Symphyotrichum kentuckiense

Hi, Reaper! I hope you are okay. It's been ten days since I've heard from you, and the review of Symphyotrichum kentuckiense is waiting on you. I have completed everything we discussed thus far and made changes you requested. When do you think you will have time to look at that again? – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 09:15, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I just got back from another (!) business trip. I should have time tomorrow to complete the review. Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:06, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for finishing up the review and being so thorough! I appreciate what you do! – Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 22:36, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 November 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Your voting guide

Hi Reaper, just wanted to let you know that your ACE guide isn't currently showing in Template:ACE2022 – if you had intended to show it there, it needs to be added manually.

Thanks for the kind words in your guide nonetheless – much appreciated

KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 07:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome; thanks for being willing to do this job! I'm personally unsure whether I should add it. Ultimately, a voter guide like mine is more to explain my thoughts and reasons for my votes. It is in the category so people can dig for it if they wish, but it isn't front-and-center like it would be if added to the template. Ironically, I don't think I've ever personally added my guides to the template, though other people have in the past. Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:07, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to our latest newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since October. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.

Blitz: Our October Copy Editing Blitz focused on July and August 2022 request months; and articles tagged for c/e in December 2021 and January 2022. Seventeen of those who signed up claimed at least one copy-edit, and between them copy-edited forty-six articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

Drive: In the November Backlog Elimination Drive, thirty editors signed up, twenty-two of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Both target months—December 2021 and January 2022—were cleared, and February was added to the target months. Sixteen requests were copy-edited and 239 articles were removed from the backlog. Barnstars awarded are here.

Blitz: Our seven-day-long December 2022 Copy Editing Blitz begins on 17 December at 00:01 (UTC)*. It will focus on articles tagged for copy-edit in February 2022, and pending requests from September and October. Barnstars awarded will be available here.

Progress report: As of 22:40, 8 December 2022, GOCE copyeditors have processed 357 requests since 1 January, there were seventy-four requests outstanding and the backlog stands at 1,791 articles. We always need skilled copy-editors; please help out if you can.

Election news: Nomination of candidates for the GOCE's Election of Coordinators for the first half of 2023 is open and continues until 23:59 on 15 December. Voting begins at 00:01 on 16 December and closes at 23:59 on 31 December. All editors in good standing (not under ArbCom or community sanctions) are eligible and self-nominations are welcomed. Coordinators serve a six-month term that ends at 23:59 on June 30. If you've thought about helping out at the Guild, please nominate yourself or any editor you consider suitable—with their permission, of course!. It's your Guild and it doesn't coordinate itself.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers and best seasonal wishes from your GOCE coordinators, Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis, Tenryuu, and Zippybonzo.

*All times and dates on this newsletter are UTC.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter error

The GOCE December 2022 newsletter, as sent on 9 December, contains an erroneous start date for our December Blitz. The Blitz will start on 11 December rather than on 17 December, as stated in the newsletter. I'm sorry for the mistake and for disrupting your talk page; thanks for your understanding. Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings

Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}}

Donner60 (talk) 00:21, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Reaper Eternal!

Happy New Year!

Reaper Eternal,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
– Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 21:08, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

– Elizabeth (Eewilson) (tag or ping me) (talk) 21:08, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 January 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:46, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:37, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:13, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:14, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 February 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:45, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors 2022 Annual Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2022 Annual Report
Our 2022 Annual Report is now ready for review.

Highlights:

  • Overview of Backlog-reduction progress
  • Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page
  • Membership news and results of elections
  • Closing words
– Your Guild coordinators: Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:03, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 March 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:42, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors March 2023 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors March 2023 Newsletter


Hello and welcome to the March 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since December and our Annual Report for 2022. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. We extend a warm welcome to all of our new members, including those who have signed up for our current March Backlog Elimination Drive. We wish you all happy copy-editing.

Election results: In our December 2022 coordinator election, Reidgreg and Tenryuu stepped down as coordinators; we thank them for their service. Incumbents Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo were returned as coordinators until 1 July. For the second time, no lead coordinator was chosen. Nominations for our mid-year Election of Coordinators open on 1 June (UTC).

Drive: 21 editors signed up for our January Backlog Elimination Drive, 14 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 170 articles totaling 389,737 words. Barnstars awarded are here.

Blitz: Our February Copy Editing Blitz focused on October and November 2022 requests, and the March and April 2022 backlogs. Of the 14 editors who signed up, nine claimed at least one copy-edit; and between them, they copy-edited 39,150 words in 22 articles. Barnstars awarded are here.

Drive: Sign up now for our month-long March Backlog Elimination Drive. Barnstars awarded will be posted here after the drive closes.

Progress report: As of 12:08, 19 March 2023 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 73 requests since 1 January 2023, all but five of them from 2022, and the backlog stands at 1,872 articles.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Baffle gab1978, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Thank you so much for reverting all that crosswiki harassment and vandalism from that LTA the other day! — Prodraxis {talk • contribs} (she/her) 03:15, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Thoughts

Hey Brian, just wanted to let you know that I partially reverted your edits here: Special:Diff/1169027893. I reintroduced the paragraph but in a less aggressive tone, I think primarily we should separate the concerns of a clerk vs. patrolling admin, i.e. it is definitely possible for a patrolling admin to clerk effectively but also the other way around, and if not, that is a problem, as it creates more work for the limited number of clerks. qedk (t 愛 c) 16:09, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:17, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Septermber GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September 2023 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the September 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since June. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.

David Thomsen: Prolific Wikipedian and Guild member David Thomsen (Dthomsen8) died in November 2022. He was a regular copy editor who took part in many of our Drives and Blitzes. An obituary was published in the mid-July issue of The Signpost. Tributes can be left on David's talk page.

Election news: In our mid-year Election of Coordinators, Dhtwiki was chosen as lead coordinator, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo continue as assistant coordinators, and Baffle gab1978 stepped down from the role. If you're interested in helping out at the GOCE, please consider nominating yourself for our next election in December; it's your WikiProject and it doesn't organize itself!

June Blitz: Of the 17 editors who signed up for our June Copy Editing Blitz, 12 copy-edited at least one article. 70,035 words comprising 26 articles were copy-edited. Barnstars awarded are here.

July Drive: 34 of the 51 editors who took part in our July Backlog Elimination Drive copy-edited at least one article. They edited 276 articles and 683,633 words between them. Barnstars awarded are here.

August Blitz: In our August Copy Editing Blitz, 13 of the 16 editors who signed up worked on at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 79,608 words comprising 57 articles. Barnstars awarded are available here.

September Drive: Sign up here for our month-long September Backlog Elimination Drive, which is now underway. Barnstars awarded will be posted here.

Progress report: As of 14:29, 9 September 2023 (UTC), GOCE copy editors have processed 245 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stands at 2,066.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:37, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:44, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:10, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter

Hello, and welcome to the December 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. Don't forget that you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.

Election news: The Guild needs coordinators! If you'd like to help out, you may nominate yourself or any suitable editor—with their permission—for the Election of Coordinators for the first half of 2024. Nominations will close at 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). Voting begins immediately after the close of nominations and closes at 23:59 on 31 December. All editors in good standing (not under current sanctions) are eligible, and self-nominations are welcome. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term that ends at 23:59 on 30 June.

Drive: Of the 69 editors who signed up for the September Backlog Elimination Drive, 40 copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 661,214 words in 290 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here.

Blitz: Of the 22 editors who signed up for the October Copy Editing Blitz, 13 copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 109,327 words in 52 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here.

Drive: During the November Backlog Elimination Drive, 38 of the 58 editors who signed up copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 458,620 words in 234 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here.

Blitz: Our December Copy Editing Blitz will run from 10 to 16 December. Barnstars awarded will be posted here.

Progress report: As of 20:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 344 requests since 1 January, and the backlog stands at 2,191 articles.

Other news: Our Annual Report for 2023 is planned for release in the new year.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

Message sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:54, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Reaper_Eternal/Archive_36&oldid=1193542843"