User talk:Piotr-34789

June 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Asterix Conquers America have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Asterix Conquers America was changed by Piotr-34789 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871162 on 2023-06-21T11:21:35+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:21, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Looney Tunes Cartoons, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 21:26, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

September 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Asterix at the Olympic Games (video game), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please also see WP:VGSCOPE Waxworker (talk) 00:18, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Fandom wiki usage

Fandom wikis are an unreliable source as they are WP:USERGENERATED, see WP:FANDOM. 'ideas.fandom.com' in particular defines itself on the main page as a fanfiction/fanon wiki, explicitly stating that "Articles are more often than not completely fictitious". It is not a reliable source. Waxworker (talk) 21:36, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

@Waxworker Thanks for the information, unfortunately we still have to find who played them. Piotr-34789 (talk) 05:26, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Asterix and the Big Fight (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please see WP:BURDEN Waxworker (talk) 23:01, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

@Waxworker So where did IMDb get these sources? Piotr-34789 (talk) 06:16, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

IMDB is an unreliable source per WP:IMDB. Waxworker (talk) 14:48, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Asterix Conquers America, you may be blocked from editing. Waxworker (talk) 08:56, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024

Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Looney Tunes Cartoons, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jalen Folf (talk) 21:03, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hello @Piotr-34789, I have now twice reverted your edits on the Nothing Funny page, both times because their purpose was unclear, and you didn't leave an edit summary. In my first revert, I asked you to leave an edit summary, but you proceeded to do another edit on the same page, again without edit summary. Perhaps you overlooked what I wrote? It it a policy of Wikipedia that editors accompany their edits with a summary, so that it is clear to readers and other editors why the relevant changes were made. Please try to remember to do so in future. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 03:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)