User talk:Nsaa/User talk 2013
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello
Hello, I just want to say, the thing you edited it's not too good, little bit not neat for me. And also it's looks similar with "Result Summary" table, because you can see also who are eliminated and not advanced to Top 16 based on that table. Thanks :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.215.65.174 (talk) 06:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi 112.215.65.174, I'm not sure to what article you refer, and eventually what edits is problematic. Can you help me in the right direction? 'Nsaa (talk) 09:38, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Poshitis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks for creating the Scientific method userbox. It was just what I wanted. SchreiberBike talk 04:24, 7 July 2013 (UTC) |
The article Poshitis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This is basically a dictionary definition not an encyclopedia article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GB fan 11:08, 20 October 2013 (UTC) GB fan 11:08, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Poshitis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vogue (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Poshitis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Poshitis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poshitis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 20:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)