User talk:Nobleeagle/Archive9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Barnstar for you![edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
The name speaks for itself. You have upped a notch recently in your contributions and definitely deserve this! Keep it up! GizzaChat © 12:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The inaugural WP:PIIR barnstar[edit]

The Power in International Relations Barnstar
For many months of outstanding contributions to Wikipedia's coverage of Power in international relations, and in particular for heroic work on the Great power article, you shall be the first recipient of the WP:PIIR barnstar. Good job, Xdamrtalk 03:36, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Heh, you deserve it more than I do — if you hadn't instigated this last push for completion then we'd still be at it! What do you think, good enough for GA? One thing is for sure, it's a far cry from the Major power article we had going back in the old days!
Xdamrtalk 03:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced from terrorist organizations and blogs. I prodded it.Bakaman 18:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indo-European[edit]

Thanks for your information.

Rajsingam 11:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation: Dulha Mil Gaya[edit]

Hello, Nobleeagle, I'm seeking your advice. Shahrukh Khan's new movie seems to be called "Dulha Mil Gaya" and, erm, my Hindi is kinda rusty. I'd translate it as "I found a bride", but I could be totally wrong. Could you translate it for me, or put the translation into the corresponding article? Many thanks, --Plumcouch Talk2Me 23:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I added the translation to the article. Just to broaden my vocabulary a bit: If "dulhan" is the word for groom, I assume dulhaniya (from "Dilwale Dulhaniya etc ...") means "bride"? Best regards, --Plumcouch Talk2Me 23:20, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot for the explanation. Best regards, --Plumcouch Talk2Me 02:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emerging power[edit]

Hello NobleEagle,

I am new to Wiki, but was going through the rules. Would like to contribute to the India page. Since you are the administrator and the prime contributor to the India page, I would be seeking advice from you time to time.

I have seen you contributions to Great Power, particularly India, is it possible to make a separate sub-section in the India page pertaining to Emerging Superpower?

Shyamasundara Vetrivel 04:36, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Hello NobleEagle, Its very good to see that the words 'Great Power' has appeared in the lead! Cheers! Hope it doesn't get reverted. Shyamasundara Vetrivel 09:10, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Vikram Singh, was selected for DYK![edit]

Updated DYK query On December 30, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Vikram Singh, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 19:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Native speaker of English?[edit]

Panjabi: "praahji, tusi ai ki kende ho ke tusi 'is a native speaker of English'?Kanchanamala 07:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Since you are proficient in English, do say so. If you were born and raised in an English-speaking environment, that would make you a native speaker of English,too. Are you? I'm not. If Panjabi is your mother tongue, be proud to say so.Kanchanamala 00:12, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Trevor Chappell, was selected for DYK![edit]

Updated DYK query On January 1, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Trevor Chappell, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 23:37, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rajnath Singh.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Rajnath Singh.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for January 2nd, 2007.[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 1 2 January 2007 About the Signpost

Effort to modify fair use policy aborted Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
WikiWorld comic: "Thagomizer" News and notes: Fundraiser continues, milestones
Wikipedia in the news Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rajnath Singh[edit]

Thanks for your work on the Rajnath Singh page. The previous page of that name was appalling and justifiably deleted in toto. --Adam Brink 08:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

India as an Emerging Superpower[edit]

Hi NobleEagle, Your earlier inputs of emerging superpower in the India page lead has now been incorporated. Apparently British user, Fowler&fowler's viewpoints on relegating superpower lower in the history section and repeatedly sneaking in (in the guise of good-faith) British dominant sentences in the lead has been removed with agreements from other users. Pls see the history section of India mainpage. Let us now try to give a positive image to the India page and make it the best in Wikipedia. Would also request you to beware of foreign users trying to sneak in their foreign nationalistic colonial views in the guise of historical evidences and unfair exploitation of Wikipedia rules to give the India page a negative and poor image. Himalayanashoka 20:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hindu creationism[edit]

I was thinking about bringing this article to afd. It is full of crap and nothing else. What are your views on it.nids(♂) 11:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updated DYK query Did you know? was updated. On 4 January, 2007, a fact from the article Rajnath Singh, which you recently expanded, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--— ERcheck (talk) 13:42, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know where I am coming from[edit]

I have no idea about the politics and the virulence and trouble politically in India. It is extremely complicated, at least to an outsider. I will fully admit that the west basically raped india for a few hundred years. Anyone who is an honest student of history would admit that. Did they know what they were doing? Well I guess, but they didnt think it was bad I guess. Am I proud of the way the British, French, Dutch etc acted in India for centuries? Absolutely not. It is pretty shameful, frankly. Now when I read some stuff about Dalits, I like the Hindutva position of just aggressively trying to forget the past. However, I can see their positions as well with wanting to have some preferences set aside to help them climb out of poverty. We have the same thing here: Affirmative Action. I dont like it, and I have lost out because of it often, but I understand it and I accept it. There is no way one can turn the clock back. It seems to be working to assimilate other groups in the US anyway. But it is a huge legal mess and a minefield to get involved with. I personally do not undestand the Muslim-Hindu tensions at all, or the Buddhist-Hindu tensions or the Christian-Hindu tensions (or the Muslim-Christian tensions). None of it makes sense to me. I guess that is just how people are. Human nature eh? So who the heck is this guy RSS that everyone talks about? Was he a hindutva leader? And what are the opposition to the Hindutva called? And do the parties cut across religion or class ? Or mainly one religion or sect or class??--Filll 00:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GizzaChat © 01:04, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Hi. Please see this[1]. You might be interested. Rumpelstiltskin223 02:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2 articles[edit]

History of India and Christianity in India are being edited tendentiously. I suggest you watchlist them. Rumpelstiltskin223 05:41, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Nobleeagle,

could you drop me an email at ambrood[at]gmail.com ? अमेय आर्यन DaBrood© 10:23, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Wikipedia:Hinduism-related Collaboration of the week[edit]

You have been invited to help improve the article Sita Ram Goel in this weeks's Hinduism collaboration. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. See also these related articles. [2]

You can also vote for next's week collaboration at the project page: Wikipedia:Hinduism-related Collaboration of the week. Unfortunately, it is little known. --Bondego 14:25, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction & request[edit]

Nobleeagle: May i please have your guidance on how to customise my signature, include colours and the superscript metatext shortcuts to profile and talk pages? I would really appreciate your assistance.

-D Thanking you in anticipation

B9 hummingbird hovering 14:09, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nobleeagle: thank u so much for ur assistance...i am not well versed in coding unfortunately...i gave it a go and i thought the syntax was k, but when did the four tildes on my user page as a test it was a mess. I wanted my username to be in a rainbow ;-P (Hopefully this is not unmanagable in length and disconcerting for people). The following is the code i modelled on yours:

'''[[User:B9_hummingbird_hovering|<font color="purple">B9_h</font><font color="indigo">umm</font><font color="blue">ing</font><font color="green">bir</font><font color="yellow">d_ho</font><font color="orange">ver</font><font color="red">ing</font>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:B9_hummingbird_hovering|<font color="darkgreen" size="0.2" face="Arial Narrow"><nowiki>[TALK]]]<font_color="darkpurple"size="0.2"face="Arial_Narrow"> [C]

I would really appreciate you letting me know where i zigged when i should have zagged.

Thanx brother B9_hummingbird_hovering

Serious issues in India lead?[edit]

Hi NobleEagle,

Introducing myself. Though I am a silent reader and look forward to clean up grammatic mistakes in interesting pages because of my journalistic background. Was 'naturally' going through the India page (no contribution as yet) and saw the various versions (I hope I am right in the using the word version). The lead written by you, Chanakyathegreat, IndianStar was really good, accurate and presented a very balanced view about the country. However, an older version has appeared again, which from my point of view does not give a true picture about India.

Since you are a senior member here, would request you to look into it so that the page reads better. I would also like to contribute, now that I have an account! Rakesh85barua 16:07, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disconcerted[edit]

Please either show me what comment led you to believe that about my argument, or retract your claim. I am confident you will find you are misunderstanding me, and I hope you will correct your comment, which I find insulting and counter-productive. User:RyanFreisling @

I would be most grateful it if you would use the strikeout <s></s> to actually retract your incorrect description of my argument (the post where you said what 'disconcerted you') [3]. Otherwise, people may be confused and you haven't actually retracted your comment. Honest thanks and feel free to respond if you wish to discuss it further. -- User:RyanFreisling @ 01:18, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

may be this will be more toned done for you.--D-Boy 19:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He complained against me [4] Could you comment? Rumpelstiltskin223 04:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Out of India theory[edit]

Hi, recently you added in Dravidian substratum ... sub-section in that article. You have quoted Elst about Brahui. But, now when Brahui language is found due to migration after 1000 A.D.( even accepted by Witzel ).So, don't you think that Brahui's mention here is unnecessary. It will give false undercurrent impression of AIT.

Secondly, if you can write intro of OIT in AIT, it will be helpful ( instead of current one sided wordings ). WIN 06:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lage Raho Munna Bhai is nominated as a FAC. Pls leave your comments at its FAC. Amartyabag (Talk) 07:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like Thugchilz sock, what do you think? GizzaChat © 11:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Pakistani nationalism[edit]

Hi! An admin almost always protects the the wrong version. You can just ping the admin who protected the page and point out to him why the current version isn't the right one. I could've done it myself for you, but it is always better to ask the protecting admin first. Also, try to get the content disputes cleared at the earliest. Admins wouldnt revert to another version that is also disputed.--thunderboltz(Deepu) 13:44, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, noticed LRMB in FAC. Wouldn't a route via PR to FAC have been better for it?--thunderboltz(Deepu) 14:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'll pitch in wherever I can too. West Bengal had improved greatly during its unexpected FAC. Maybe we could do the same here.--thunderboltz(Deepu) 14:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aum vs Om[edit]

I'd like to request putting back "also called Om" in that template, since the paragraph at least gestures towards explaining both symbols. It wasn't til looking at the Aum article that I learned that Aum and Om were the same thing. I had been wondering what this big important Aum discussed in the talk page was, and "Om" explained it in one syllable. Regards, 67.117.130.181 13:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

reverting issue[edit]

instead of reverting it can you please add the paragraph back as reverting removes newer edits! And puting the Australian picture in the performance section messes up the table!--Thugchildz

CWC Awards section[edit]

It says before "Man of the tournaments" were given out, the most prestigous award of "Man of the Grand Final." Shouldn't it be Man of the Match in the final? The term Grand final isn't used in cricket as it is in the football codes. GizzaChat © 22:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Nobleeagle, do you have any plans for any CWC related FA-drives so we could have some stuff on the main page to celebrate the World Cup? In terms of biographies, many of the Australian and most of the English players (I went to Adelaide Oval) now have free images, and also so do Shoaib Akhtar, Mohammad Asif and Murali. Tendulkar and Pathan also have photos but they are of poor quality which may not be acceptable. Are you interested in getting any bios to FA? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:30, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yeah, btw, all those history pages have been unlocked now that Siddiqui and his socks, as well as Szhaider have been blocked. ARe you going to get email activated some time? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just to let you know, I based the article on FIFA World Cup and Rugby World Cup. The one section we still lack is "Media coverage." GizzaChat © 04:38, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Casey14 on Great power[edit]

I broke out two of Casey14's quotes for further discussion on the talk page. Also, I hope you don't mind that I used you as an example in Talk:Great power#Sourcing—I trust you realize I'm not speaking of you or Danilovic but to sourcing in general. Cheers! CRGreathouse (t | c) 03:38, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Swastika poll[edit]

It may be useful to specify (before anyone votes) that the only template being discussed in Template:Hindu Links. Thanks Abecedare 06:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you dislike my voting in each section of your ridiculous poll does not give you the right, either real, perceived or assumed, to remove my vote from any section, especially not, twice in a row, as of this writing, "except in the section wherein you have cast your own vote"!!! What is your problem? Open another ridiculous poll, fine. Don't presume to think of yourself as the sole arbiter of how that poll should be conducted at the same time. Such wanton hubris. Tomertalk 06:38, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Nobleeagle. Sorry for getting Tomer riled up. I just really didn't appreciate his incivility regarding the poll. MetsFan76 06:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't assume bad faith, I just expressed my sentiment that the poll is frivolous. What riled me up was the fact that at least twice [so far], you've dismissed my sentiment by assiduously deleting my statements in sections w/ which you disagree. That said, I thing SaddleRiver's statement above begs a citation. Where, exactly, was I incivil? Tomertalk 06:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
SaddleRiver? MetsFan76 06:56, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Joe from Saddle River. What kind of fan are you? Every WFAN listener should know that reference.  :-) Tomertalk 07:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I have box seats and I'm usually at every game and some away games (no need for WFAN). I'm not your average Mets fan =) MetsFan76 07:14, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously, since you're apparently also, somewhat antisymptomatically, a Giants fan.  :-p Tomertalk 07:19, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
And I have nothing to be ashamed about by being a Giants fan either. :-p MetsFan76 07:21, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ya ya ya. :-P Gnite. You have a good night too, Noble_eagle...thanks for letting us chitchat on your talkpage. :-) Tomertalk 07:26, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Good night bro.....Go Jets!!!! LMAO!! =)MetsFan76 07:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for January 8th, 2007.[edit]

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 2 8 January 2007 About the Signpost

Special: 2006 in Review Another newspaper columnist found to have plagiarized Wikipedia
Blogs track attempts to manipulate articles Nutritional beef cooks PR editor
WikiWorld comic: "Facial Hair" News and notes: Fundraiser continues, milestones
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of films with similar themes and release dates AfD[edit]

Hi, you've expressed an opinion in the deletion discussion of this article. I've recently suggested a compromise in hopes of improving the article while keeping both sides happy, and would appreciate if you could revisit the issue. Thanks. --Wafulz 18:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]