User talk:Ncr09

Talk:National Church Residences Senior Housing --Ncr09 (talk) 03:21, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010[edit]

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 20:51, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Am not affiliated with NCR. Made some changes. Added references/sources. Can someone help so I can get this to go live? Ncr09 (talk) 17:26, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} I need to know if my page is ready to be moved into mainspace so it can go "live?" I requested help in moving/renaming it on March 11 but have not gotten a response.

Post a request at WP:Requests for feedback. JohnCD (talk) 13:43, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[Copy of reply I just left for you at WP:FEED]. You left a request at the Editor assistance requests page earlier this month and a reply was left for you there. Because you did not respond, the message thread was archived. You can find it at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests/Archive 72#need help editing and posting article. As far as I can tell the same comments apply to the draft article now -- it does not demonstrate the notability of the subject per the guidelines at WP:ORG. – ukexpat (talk) 18:47, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite ready[edit]

In my opinion, your article (here) is not quite ready to move into article space. I'll explain why, and remove the "request to move this draft into article space". Other editors may feel differently, so if you disagree with my reasons, feel free to replace the template, and someone else may move it for you.

Wikipedia articles have a specific structure to them, specified in a guideline called Layout (Click on the link to see the details). Your draft doesn't incorporate some of the required elements of the structure. If you read the page, it will help you understand what is needed and how to do it.

It is important for Wikipedia articles to have references to reliable sources. While you have some items labeled as references, they are not formed as they should be. As a guide to including references properly , please see Citing sources and footnotes. Please add some references in the correct form to support the factual claims in the draft article.--SPhilbrick T 01:41, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]