User talk:Narayana Samy Nayak

Helo sir, madurai nayaks were not balijas, they were kammas. I have proofs

Yes!

I am also a KAMMA. I telling that madurai nayaks as kammas. Madurai nayaks were pure kammas.

Well, provide a reference from a reliable source that shows that.--Shirt58 (talk) 01:10, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013

Hello, I'm Tgeairn. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Template:APhistory with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Tgeairn (talk) 04:47, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for continuing the same disruptive editing behavior that got you blocked last time. You can't just blank pages because you disagree with their content. More importantly, you can't add content to Wikipedia just because you believe it to be true--it must be verified in reliable sources. You have been told several times that what you are doing is wrong, but you keep persisting in trying to force your preferences through. If you repeat this behavior, the next block will be indefinite per the discretionary sanctions on caste-related articles, which I'll leave a template for below.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Qwyrxian (talk) 11:32, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

March 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Thirumalai Nayak was changed by Narayana Samy Nayak (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959212 on 2013-03-29T04:49:48+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:49, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing on an article covered by WP:General sanctions. You were warned multiple times, and it appears that the only way to stop the disruption to the encyclopedia is to block you indefinitely. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Qwyrxian (talk) 08:30, 29 March 2013 (UTC)