User talk:I Mertex I

April 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Hddty (talk) 06:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Chloe Bennet

A couple of issues, you are adding in sources that are not accepted by wikipedia. The Daily Mail one is barred from being used (see WP:RSP). The partners isn't mentioned in the article, that's highly trivial. Please don't restore your edits. Govvy (talk) 10:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Yamla (talk) 13:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Warning

Warning!

The article Jair Bolsonaro has it's pics changed every five days. There has to have some stability, especially when talking about WP:BLP. Use the talk page first, expose why the picture needs to be changed and see if other users agree with you. But, always search for WP:Consensus before making important changes (especially in controversial articles). I suggest you don't engage in WP:EW (or WP:POINTy, as a matter of fact). Won't be good for anyone. Cheers! Coltsfan (talk) 20:39, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Harrassment

You appear to be more interested in wreaking havoc than making valuable contributions. Please cease and desist before we have to seek an injunction.RedSoxFan8888 (talk) 15:08, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

3RR reminder

• In light of your prior warnings about the three-revert rule, I strongly suggest you self-revert your latest revert at Paul Bilzerian and bring yourself back in compliance with 3RR. —C.Fred (talk) 17:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for self-reverting and engaging in discussion at the talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 17:20, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

Warning re Edit Warring

Warning!

Please do not WP:EDITWAR as you did with this edit. NedFausa (talk) 22:59, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. NedFausa (talk) 01:06, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Magdalen Berns biography

Regarding your recent edits to the article, see Talk:Magdalen Berns#"Transphobic" and "TERF" (here we go again). Pyxis Solitary (yak). L not Q. 07:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

"Los diez fugitivos más buscados por el FBI" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Los diez fugitivos más buscados por el FBI. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 27#Los diez fugitivos más buscados por el FBI until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Richard Reid "Shoe Bomber".jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Richard Reid "Shoe Bomber".jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Mike 🗩 14:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)