User talk:GulchinHuseynova

GulchinHuseynova, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi GulchinHuseynova! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello GulchinHuseynova, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Tar (string instrument) have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:36, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Your addition to Tar (string instrument) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:35, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Balakən has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:26, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Diannaa 🍁

This is the second time, I have the same problem. Although I have shown the reference and even linked the sentence which was taken from the source, you have removed it because of copyright violation. Can you tell me what is wrong with my references?

Thanks. GulchinHuseynova (talk) 20:03, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prose you find online is almost always copyright, and cannot be copied here; it's against the law to do so. All prose must be written in your own words. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Copyright law and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Advisory[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Étienne Dolet (talk) 18:25, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Especially concerning this edit: [1]. Language such as: "Azerbaijani people, officials and mass-media called this attack as an act of fascism by Armenian barbarians" is not WP:NPOV. Étienne Dolet (talk) 18:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Étienne Dolet ,

Thank you for your recent comment. I have read the advisory information and clearly understood it. I see the sentence""Azerbaijani people, officials and mass-media called this attack as an act of fascism by Armenian barbarians" is not appropriate for editing. But, Can you please tell me why the whole edit was removed from the article ?

Thanks. GulchinHuseynova (talk) 09:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gulchin, have you considered adding it in the other section After 1994 instead of creating another section? The way you added it might suggest it being on par with the clash of 2016. I don't guarantee you the other side will accept it (bring it in the talkpage). But at least if they refuse you can always bring the argument that in the After 1994 section there are comparable cases which are included. Also if you tone it down a little you might increase your chances. Oh and you don't need to add half a dozen of notes to support the same thing... just take the two which you consider the most reliable. Yaḥyā ‎ (talk) 23:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yaḥyā ‎,

Thank you for your comment and recent changes. I am new to the Wikipedia and can have mistakes. But some users delete my whole edits without commenting. I highly appreciate your recommendations and will follow in my future edits. Thanks again.

Regards, GulchinHuseynova (talk) 08:13, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Cardiology. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:05, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent comment. I attributed the content. Thank you.GulchinHuseynova (talk) 08:45, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Farid Huseynli[edit]

Hello GulchinHuseynova,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Farid Huseynli for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 17:20, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again SamHolt6.

Thank you your comments. I highly appreciate them as I am new to the Wikipedia. Farid Huseynli is a popular cartoonist in Azerbaijan and work for the cartoon magazine which is considered as a successor of "Molla Nasraddin". I think the information added in the article can be considered important for people who follow his cartoons. He has more than thousands of followers in Instagram and Facebook.Is there any chance not to delete the page?

Thanks.

Regards, GulchinHuseynova (talk) 17:29, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Farid Huseynli[edit]

Hi, I'm SamHolt6. GulchinHuseynova, thanks for creating Farid Huseynli!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Various tags, see article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

SamHolt6 (talk) 17:20, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, SamHolt6, thanks for comments.

I will try to develop the page.

GulchinHuseynova (talk) 17:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Farid Huseynli[edit]

Hello, GulchinHuseynova,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Farid Huseynli should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farid Huseynli .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

SamHolt6 (talk) 02:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, GulchinHuseynova. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]