User talk:Gatorboy

Welcome!

Hello, Gatorboy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 18:52, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at André the Giant. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dr. K. 03:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Gregg Popovich, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Specifically, MOS:SPELL09 advises that integers 0–9 are generally spelled out. —Bagumba (talk) 07:44, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page Zaza Pachulia appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 17:18, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He's on Detroit[edit]

Google it Gatorboy (talk) 20:23, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Liv Morgan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 01:22, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Brandi Rhodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:56, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Brandi Rhodes. StaticVapor message me! 23:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 01:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Jaymes[edit]

I have reverted your edits on Jessica Jaymes because the current information indicates she was 40. Please see and contribute to the discussion on the talk page if you think it should be 43. Johndavies837 (talk) 11:00, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Los Angeles County Coroner has confirmed Jaymes was 40 years old. Johndavies837 (talk) 10:21, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Patty Mullen, you may be blocked from editing. You received multiple warnings about this last year. If you continue to add unsourced content, you will be re-blocked. Please stop. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 20:45, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why? A simple Google search tells you the womam's age. Why am I the bad guy for providing accurate information. I thought that was the point of Wikipedia. Gatorboy (talk) 05:10, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As far the matter of fact, if it makes you feel better Google her age and insert it into her page with the proper citation and formating. The Wikipedia sites aren't about me. They're about accurate information, right? BTW, she is from Staten Island so you can take out the citation needed tag OR Google that too and cite your source. Gatorboy (talk) 05:23, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All I've ever done is provide ACCURATE INFORMATION. FYI Gatorboy (talk) 05:27, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And another thing, if you look at Brandi Rhodes page right now it includes the information I provided last year. BECAUSE IT'S TRUTHFUl, somebody else added it end. You need to be concerned with ppl who help provide complete profiles, not being content with half-assed bullshit. Gatorboy (talk) 00:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]