User talk:Ferrofield
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Åke Gerhard Ekstrand, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.avblixten.info/e/5q7xu2p7nbuq8747.html.
It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:10, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Today is not 2010[edit]
...so please don't say that again, as you did on Control panel (engineering). Thanks, <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 14:00, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
- You have put "today" there again. And that is also unsourced and will be embarrassingly outdated and then nobody knows in what context it was written to be true. "Today" moves through time and so things change. It's better to specify the year and people will then have to change that as long as it is true. Ferrofield (talk) 18:30, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
Ferrofield, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Ferrofield! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 18:39, 23 March 2016 (UTC) |
Talkback[edit]
Message added 04:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Laber□T 04:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 27[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew Guinand, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fourier and Poisson formula. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Masreliez's theorem[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Masreliez's theorem, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jps (talk) 18:46, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of C. Johan Masreliez for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C. Johan Masreliez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. Johan Masreliez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 18:48, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Masreliez's theorem for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Masreliez's theorem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masreliez's theorem until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 22:34, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Masreliez's theorem for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Masreliez's theorem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masreliez's theorem until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jps (talk) 22:34, 6 December 2017 (UTC)