User talk:DonCalo/Archive 2021

Proposed deletion of Luigi Ursino[edit]

The article Luigi Ursino has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not written in any language

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 13:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Antonino Giuffre.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Antonino Giuffre.jpg, which you've attributed to https://web.archive.org/web/20060623034714/https://digilander.libero.it/inmemoria/boss_mafiosi.htm#Boss%20mafiosi. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sennecaster (What now?) 22:06, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rosario Riccobono.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rosario Riccobono.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:50, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Tommaso Besozzi.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tommaso Besozzi.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Pietro Scaglione.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pietro Scaglione.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

File:Giuseppe Alessi (Italian politician).jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eugénie Fougère, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gaetano Salvemini[edit]

You made an incorrect edit on the Wikipedia page of Gaetano Salvemini as well as deleted a source that showed proof of the correct date. The Minister of the Underworld, or Il ministro della malavita was published in 1910 but re-edited and reissued again in 1919. The version which is most commonly referenced is the 1919 version of the essays and is the most popular. It was originally published in 1910 however, it makes more sense to use the final 1919 version as the one on his Wikipedia page as it is his final, revised draft. As a close friend of Gaetano’s family, it is also their wish and recommendation to insert the 1919 version or clarify the situation on the page. 2603:7000:4B3E:8B0E:2915:325C:EE84:5115 (talk) 02:12, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The correct date for the first edition is 1910 as you acknowledge yourself. The 1919 second edition is mentioned as well. It is all clearly clarified, so what is the problem? I did add the reference to the 1919 edition that some one provided, as indeed that might be useful. As a self-proclaimed close friend of the Salvemini, I would recommend you to have a look at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. I hope that with the inclusion of a reference to 1919 edition the issue is settled. - DonCalo (talk) 18:12, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]