Jump to content

User talk:Dbkreiss

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome[edit]

Hello Dbkreiss and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.

Български | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Lietuvių | 한국어 | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Suomi | Svenska | Türkçe | 简体中文 | The main embassy page edit

Getting Started
Getting help
The Commmunity
Policies and Guidelines
Things to do

Click here to reply to this message.

ukexpat (talk) 16:45, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Adobe Flash Ecosystem[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Adobe Flash Ecosystem, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Superfluous to other articles (suggest a quick merge).

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 20:31, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alternatives to Adobe Flash[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alternatives to Adobe Flash, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

An essay; not encyclopedic

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds (talk) 20:32, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alternatives to flash[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alternatives to flash, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unencyclopedic essay

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds (talk) 20:33, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]