User talk:Alphakatt

This is Alphakatt's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mthunzi has been accepted[edit]

Mthunzi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 08:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 23:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alphakatt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Iam appealing for unblock simply for violating wikipedias polocy for sockpuppet, I am contesting for unblock because I am a human and like other humans I also do mistakes. I would be happy to get unblocked to continue creating articles and contributing my knowledge in this encyclopedia, thank you.

Decline reason:

You will need to request unblock from your original account, or at least tell us why you can't. We don't generally unblock sock accounts. 331dot (talk) 07:56, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alphakatt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

as I am instructed by an administrative to request to appeal using my original account, I so wish I can but honestly I can't reason being I forgot my log in detalis, which is also one of the reasons why I created this account.

Decline reason:

You are banned, not just blocked, because you've been so abusive. No admin is free to unilaterally lift your ban. That abuse has continued with this account. There's absolutely no chance your ban will be lifted while you continue to demonstrate you haven't the slightest intention of following our policies. WP:SO is a possibility but you have a long road ahead of you, accounting for your years of abuse. Yamla (talk) 17:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)I[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alphakatt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

is there anything else I can do to get unblocked and continue editing ? I have contributed alot with this account with 6 active clean articles I have created, and i am positively looking forward to write more articles with this blocked account once the block gets removed. I am also pleading for unblock so that my active written articles can be restored and so I can expand them on my free hours but one big reason why I cant use my previous account is because I forgot my log in details, from my deepest, I would be so happy to be given another chance of using this account to contribute more on wikipedia looking forward admins.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline per TPAR below; no reason to keep this open. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:50, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No, the only pathway forward is as Yamla describes. As you are banned there must be a community discussion to remove the ban, and there is zero chance of the community agreeing to do that anytime soon. If you are prepared to observe our policies, you will do as Yamla describes. If you aren't, and prefer further evading your block, then you are just wasting our time here and should withdraw your request. 331dot (talk) 08:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do I start the community discussion ? Please Start it for me if it can also be created by an administrator.Alphakatt (talk) 14:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you absolutely sure? If I start the community discussion for you, I'm going to recommend your ban be upheld and no further unban requests considered for at least a year, if not two years, from your last edit. I think this is a catastrophically bad idea on your part. --Yamla (talk) 15:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla, there is no reason for anyone to start a community discussion. It would be a waste of everyone's time. As for the user having lost their password to the master account, there is e-mail associated with the account, so they should be able to recover it if they want to initiate some sort of discussion there. I don't want to step on anyone's toes, but I believe TPA should be revoked here.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:08, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla yes, please Start the discussion for me, Bbb23the thing is I lost my device i was using to access my masters account. I would've considered resetting my password through email but my device got stolen. I tried to recover the email as well but there is no luck.I believe the discussion will be the only way I can get unbanned and access the ability to write on wikipedia with this active account. If create another account, I'll also get blocked which that for me to do will be a waste of time and energy. Please admins help me with this because I so love wikipedia and this makes me feel left outside and unwelcomed.Alphakatt (talk) 07:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AFAIK, recovering your password is not device-dependent. You should be able to follow the instructions at Wikipedia:FAQ/Technical#How do I recover a password I have forgotten?.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On reflection, no. I will not do so. It would be so clearly a deliberate waste of time. If anyone else does, I'll comment on the community discussion. --Yamla (talk) 10:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how long can it take for this block to be removed or do I have to create another account ? Alphakatt (talk) 11:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do not create another account. I want to be very clear here, you personally are blocked. You personally are not permitted to edit Wikipedia. It doesn't matter whether you use this account or another account, you personally are not permitted to edit Wikipedia. I very strongly suggest you take down your open unblock request and wait at least six months. That would be 2024-11-08, if you stop editing after taking down your open request. There's no guarantee you'll ever be unbanned. Your comments here show you most certainly should not be unbanned at this time. But if you continue to evade your ban, you substantially reduce the possibility your ban will ever be lifted. --Yamla (talk) 11:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla that's so long to wait 😰, I don't think I will patiently wait that long without editing and writing here on Wikipedia. I so wish the this ban and block could be just removed, I am so affected.Alphakatt (talk) 15:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC) Will the articles I wrote be reverted back to the mainspace if I get unblocked ? Alphakatt (talk) 15:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous. Now we have thinly veiled threats to continue socking unless they are unblocked. TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]