User talk:Ajargals

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Élisabeth Badinter[edit]

Hey Ajargals, I wanted to let you know that I removed some content from this article because it appeared to be a direct 1 to 1 translation from the original article. Even though it is a translation, it still counts as close paraphrasing and is a copyright violation. It's fine to use non-English sources, but you have to restate the information in your own words so that it is creatively your own work that you can legally put onto Wikipedia. TimothyJosephWood 21:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I used some poor language here. Directly translating from the non-English Wikipedia article is ok, but translating directly from the source, which is what I was talking about, is not. TimothyJosephWood 22:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MOLOM Tsend (February 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ajargals! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: MOLOM Tsend (February 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Molom Tsend (February 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aseleste was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 13:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Molom Tsend has been accepted[edit]

Molom Tsend, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]