User talk:137.44.1.174

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Blackie Lawless, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --darolew (talk) 22:15, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Cwmbran. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ♦ Jongleur100 talk 17:31, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

February 2010[edit]

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Aston Villa F. C. worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Willdow (Talk) 09:16, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Shaun Bailey has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Trusilver 19:36, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to List of Muslim scientists, you will be blocked from editing. Snowolf How can I help? 00:55, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Kel Mitchell has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_6JjB3-XN0. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

May 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Hendrefoilan worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. HarlandQPitt 18:55, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Muscle contraction, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Muscle contraction was changed by 137.44.1.174 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-05-15T19:38:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:38, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Peter Symonds College has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. tutterMouse (talk) 13:46, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Russians in the United Kingdom has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. the wub "?!" 19:12, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to List of Muslim scientists constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 19:15, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to List of Muslim scientists. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Vrenator (talk) 19:18, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Old English, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —teb728 t c 20:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at List of trigonometric identities, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Glenn L (talk) 16:10, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page Alastair Kellock worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. Pi (Talk to me! ) 18:40, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Leamington Spa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:06, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Simon Church. Thank you. Quasihuman | Talk 13:52, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Investiture Controversy with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kai Ojima (talk) 19:11, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Evesham. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:41, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username TwistOfCain. I noticed that you recently made an edit that seemed to be a test. Congratulations, your test worked! If you would like to experiment further, you are welcome to use the sandbox. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, and we care a lot about the quality of the encyclopedia. Please help us make it better! Thanks, TwistOfCain (talk) 01:12, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article The Bahamas, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Donald Albury 22:31, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Your recent edit to the page Professor Green with this edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Bryce (talk | contribs) 00:58, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Prince Henry's High School. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Possible vandalism: adding nonsense BLP alumni. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:30, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Teenage pregnancy and sexual health in the United Kingdom. RandomAct(talk to me) 19:19, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Evesham with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. RA0808 talkcontribs 17:27, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Worldy. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

{{reflist}}

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 16:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.


Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Fumitol|talk|cont 18:42, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Domino's Pizza UK & IRL, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Insurgency in the Republic of Macedonia with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Geoff Who, me? 01:56, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dinas Powys. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Luke (Talk) 02:13, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Harriet Smith Windsor, you may be blocked from editing. Allens (talk | contribs) 19:41, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Gilliam. An edit that you recently made to The Royal Bank of Scotland Group seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – Gilliam (talk) 13:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Bentogoa. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Atomic force microscopy— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bentogoa (talk) 13:58, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Integrated multi-trophic aquaculture was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://sciencetell.wordpress.com/2013/10/31/what-is-imta/Online) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:22, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Control register. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 3 of ♦ I go first 16:29, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Swansea University amendments[edit]

Please remove promotional content and inappropriate external links, and add content written from a neutral point of view. (March 2016) May rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, please replace with more appropriate citations (October 2015)

Hello I work for Swansea University. Some of the information in our Wikipedia entry is no longer correct and could be misleading to potential students. We really don't want the piece to come across like an advert because that undermines its authority but I cannot edit because our IP address has been banned due to previous vandalism by students. Please would you advise? Would I be able to provide you with the relevant information and links to amend? I could also upload more recent images for you. Thanks Cathy Cathylizduncan (talk) 16:31, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm LM2000. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Birmingham has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. LM2000 (talk) 00:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Emma Stone, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization Talk 22:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Volkswagen emissions scandal, you may be blocked from editing. TwoTwoHello (talk) 11:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Rollingcontributor. An edit that you recently made to Law of large numbers seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! RoCo(talk) 15:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Adam9007. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Port Harcourt— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adam9007 (talk) 01:11, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Port Harcourt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adam9007 (talk) 01:22, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Nihlus. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Coca-Cola Zero Sugar, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nihlus 08:38, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to April 29— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 15:32, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Half-caste. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:15, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]