User:ClaudeReigns/Full Cavity Search

Everything we do on Wikipedia is subject to the Full Cavity Search of peer-review. This means that when an another editor would like to remove unsourced material, or tag your unlinked source for verifiability, or question a verified source's reliability - among other things - the proper welcoming attitude should be to accept the orificial probe and say, "Please, sir, could I have some more?" Neither "I verified my source" nor "Assume Good Faith!" is an excuse for a lack of peer-review. Peer review means just that - one of your fellows gets a chance to check your work or be assured by one of our other fellows that all is on the up and up.

There are many grand and wonderful mysteries in the world. This is all well and fine. However, statements in Wikipedia namespace do not belong in this category. We may need to request our top secret agent to infiltrate the Vatican like a scene from the DaVinci Code meets The Bourne Identity to see that the statement in namespace is really an accurate paraphrase from The Pope's Dope (1420). It's fine if an editor has never heard of The Gamecock. It's also equally fine if another editor would like to see your Gamecock source. This is no place to be shy. Show your Gamecock proudly.