Template:Did you know nominations/Funeral of a Mummy on the Nile

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Funeral of a Mummy on the Nile

Funeral of a Mummy on the Nile
Funeral of a Mummy on the Nile
  • ... that Bridgman's painting Funeral of a Mummy on the Nile (pictured) was inspired by the painter's travels to Egypt? Source: Patterson, J.D., [1](Beyond Orientalism: Nineteenth century Egyptomania and Frederick Arthur Bridgman's “The Funeral of a Mummy”), p. 28-34
    • ALT1: ... that Bridgman's painting Funeral of a Mummy on the Nile (pictured) was purchased by newspaper tycoon James Gordon Bennett Jr.? Source: Fort, Ilene Susan, [2](Frederick Arthur Bridgman and the American fascination with the exotic Near East. (Volumes I and II)), p. 147
    • ALT2: ... that the whereabouts of Bridgman's painting Funeral of a Mummy on the Nile (pictured) were unknown for over 100 years? Source: Patterson, J.D., [3](Beyond Orientalism: Nineteenth century Egyptomania and Frederick Arthur Bridgman's “The Funeral of a Mummy”), p. 36
    • Reviewed: [[]]
    • Comment: My first nomination.

Created by CaptainOlimar42 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Funeral of a Mummy on the Nile; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • New enough, long enough and well-written. No discernible policy violations. The image is nice and properly licensed. No QPQ needed as this is the first DYK nomination by CaptainOlimar42. The hooks are slightly problematic; there is an inline citation supporting the sentence providing the fact of ALT2, but not the other hooks. This would need to be addressed if you wish to use them. I would however strongly argue in favour of ALT2, which I think is the more intriguing. The other ones are not immediately attention-grabbing in the way a hook is meant to be, I think. If the nominator is OK with going ahead with ALT2, I could tick this as passed and strike out the other two hook alternatives. Apart from that: nice work! It is a little gem of an article. Regards, Yakikaki (talk) 10:01, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
I have no objections against going with ALT2, I would agree that it is probably the most attention-grabbing hook, so you are welcome to cross out the other two. Thank you for the kind words (and for the review, of course)! --CaptainOlimar42 (talk) 20:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Very well, then it is good to go with ALT2. Yakikaki (talk) 20:47, 9 March 2024 (UTC)