Talk:William Tate (soldier)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Biography / European / French / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

Biography Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Age[edit]

There seems to be some confusion as to the actual age of Tate. As is correctly stated in the article, Richard Rose in his paper gives his age at the time of the landing as 44. The date of birth in the article, though, is 1744. If Tate was in fact 44 at the time of the invasion, his date of birth would be around 1753.

In addition, John D. Ahlstrom in his paper on William Tate for the South Carolina Historical Society gives his date of birth as 1728. Which would have made him 68 or 69 at the time of the invasion.

Any which way, the date of birth given in this article is most probably the wrong one. 80.108.50.244 (talk) 10:58, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]