This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
I'm happy to see an article about Valborg Olander! However, shouldn't one make a bit clearer that the 2008 film is not a biographical pic but takes aspects from Lagerlöf's life and weaves them together very liberally for the sake of the plot?
(Note: I'm not disputing the love relationship -- there's indeed ample evidence for it.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marschallin (talk • contribs) 09:37, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the article only mentions this very briefly as it is now:
The relationship between Selma Lagerlöf, Valborg Olander and Olander's rival, the writer Sophie Elkan, was portryayed in a TV Series written by Åsa Lantz in 2008, with Helena Bergström as Selma Lagerlöf, Ingela Olsson as Valborg Olander and Alexandra Rapaport as Sophie Elkan.
As it is now, it only states that these three women (whose relationship is historically accurate: the fact that Elkan was Olanders rival is not historically controversial) is portrayed in the film and by whom, which is enough, as this is not an article about the film. The film should have its own article, were it can be discussed and described more carefully. If the film was a documentary, it would have been stated, but as it is a film, it can be taken for granted that it is not completely accurate in every detail, as films very seldom are. But the film should of course have its own clarifying article! --Aciram (talk) 13:29, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose it depends on what one understands by "portrayed". Marschallin (talk) 23:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
