Talk:UN Women Goodwill Ambassador

International relations: United Nations High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations (assessed as Mid-importance).

Requested move 11 March 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) -- Calidum 15:23, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UN Women Goodwill Ambassador → UNWOMEN Goodwill Ambassador – I moved this page in error against the established practices of the Wikipedia UN Project. Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 14:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessary, It is already fixed with Wikidata, the designation "UNWOMEN" is most searched for as UN Women and appears that they, the "UN Women" organization prefers to use the designation UN Women as opposed to the United Nations designated format of UNWOMEN. I say leave it stand as it is now as UN Women and leave the redirect in place, it is alternately named in Wikidata already. Problemsmith (talk) 21:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC) Edited Problemsmith (talk) 12:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose we shouldn't replicate such weird stylizations. I don't see either UN Women or independent sources using it. (t · c) buidhe 21:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.