Talk:Table of Clebsch–Gordan coefficients

Is it possible to upload scripts on wikipedia that generates this coefficients based on inputs? That'd be very useful when looking up higher spins not on this table. Rogermong2 02:25, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know for uploading a script here but you can find that kind of script here: http://www.gleet.org.uk/cleb/cgjava.html Deadjackpit 03:42, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is not uncommon to omit the square root signs, giving chances instead of coefficients. (Minus signs should be kept, off course, and it should be noted that a square root is implied over all values, not the signs.) This would make the tables look a lot less messy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.98.161.88 (talk) 14:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is an error in formula - some fractional in some cases have negative argument. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.181.11.172 (talk) 08:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

Without altering the tables, I have cleaned up the text and references. Accordingly, I'll remove the cleanup tag. If there are still issues with the page, please feel free to restore the cleanup tag and leave a note here to say what's needed. Thanks. --Reuben (talk) 18:00, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notation[edit]

I think it would be useful to specify the meaning of the indexes inside the bras and kets: which is the total momentum, which it's projection, the uncoupled momentums and their projections... --81.32.28.94 (talk) 15:54, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]