Talk:TVR Tamora

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Designers[edit]

FYI Mr.choppers there is a problem with the content you keep adding back and that is a source. If you have found a source then you are welcome to add it back. U¹ _quattro TALK 16:39, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is the problem? There is no reason to doubt the veracity of the statement. It was added in 2014 by an ip who stated this in their edit summary:

Reference to this can be found in publications: CAR magazine, <ref></January 2001 "The offspring" story by Mike Duff and photography by Tom Salt. Top Gear magazine, August 2001

. As usual you go around deleting things without basis. Assume good faith, unless there is reason to believe otherwise. Mr.choppers | ✎ 18:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also from WP:VERIFIABILITY (bolding mine): "Whether and how quickly material should be initially removed for not having an inline citation to a reliable source depends on the material and the overall state of the article. In some cases, editors may object if you remove material without giving them time to provide references; consider adding a citation needed tag as an interim step. When tagging or removing material for lacking an inline citation, please state your concern that it may not be possible to find a published reliable source and the material therefore may not be verifiable.[5] If you think the material is verifiable, you are encouraged to provide an inline citation yourself before considering whether to remove or tag it." Mr.choppers | ✎ 18:41, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing your recent edit pattern, you're in violation of WP:VERIFIABILITY as after violating WP:3RR again, you came up with a source. You were told to find a citation (source) yet you continue to add the material back without finding a source. U¹ _quattro TALK 19:12, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]