Talk:Smart Parts

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Paintball (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Paintball, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.PaintballWikipedia:WikiProject PaintballTemplate:WikiProject PaintballPaintball articles

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 14/5/2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Untitled[edit]

Smart Parts, Inc. is in Loyalhanna, PA

The author of this page seems to use quite a few weasel words. 68.110.28.39 20:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Patent controversy NPOV[edit]

The section on patent controversy, particularly near the end, is un-cited and reeks of opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbac (talk • contribs) 20:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, and it's gone. Restore only with sources please. Jwoodger (talk) 05:26, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MROF[edit]

Under the SP1 section someone wrote 'As with the Vibe, players whom own this marker are finding ways to shut off the MROF limiter' but nowhere on the page is the acronym MROF defined. Can anyone shed some light? Kevinharbin (talk) 18:17, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MROF stands for Maximum Rate Of Fire. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.124.88.19 (talk) 23:39, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Paintball[edit]

The Paintball WikiProject has been created. Please take a moment to visit its page, and join if you are interested. Thanks! - Maximilli, 19:11, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pvi promo.jpg[edit]

Image:Pvi promo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 13:43, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]