Talk:Runes of Magic

A fact from Runes of Magic appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 February 2009, and was viewed approximately 4,100 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that on its first day of open beta testing, 20,000 players created 100,000 player characters in the free online video game Runes of Magic?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/February.

Wikipedia

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

List of songs in Fortnite Festival (5 participants)
Pilgrimage (demoparty) (1 participant)
Morrigan Aensland (7 participants)
Kasumi (Dead or Alive) (4 participants)
Ultimate Knight Windom XP (0 participants)
Creative Vault Studios (1 participant)
Astra Superstars (3 participants)
Griffin Burns (4 participants)
Mundfish (1 participant; relisted)
Homa (company) (3 participants; relisted)
Mario vs. Donkey Kong (video game) (11 participants; relisted)
Juhani (Star Wars) (5 participants; relisted)
Starwing Paradox (4 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Had link to italian version[edit]

There's also a Runes of Magic page on italian wikipedia. Addlink please —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.18.253.153 (talk) 22:15, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Nyme (talk) 12:44, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement[edit]

Some parts, like the Press Quotes, seem like advertisements. That's just my 2 cents, not sure if others will agree —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.184.35.169 (talk) 04:56, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree. The article is a lot larger and more comprehensive than how I left it but neutrality, formatting and due weight have gone flying out of the window. *Sigh*. Someone another 23:53, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the class descriptions seem to come from marketing releases, but the article is, on the whole, much better than it was last time I came here. It could do with a lot more objective detail, though. Nyelvmark (talk) 19:05, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Character Creation Section?[edit]

How messy -

"Classes: HUMAN -Warrior - Main fighting class in the game. -Scout - DPS class using ranged weapons and daggers. -Rogue - Heavy DPS class using only short swords and daggers but more stealth than the scout. -Mage - Main damage dealer with low DEF and HP -Priest - Main Healer of the party -Knight - The "wall" of the party with a lot of DEF and HP ELF -Druid - Main healer of the party same as priest to humans -Warden - Can summon pets and has some knowledge of fighting"

Someone please clean that up.209.195.102.37 (talk) 21:08, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just did with the delete button, apart from the bare list of character classes it was just restating what I put in the gameplay section when I originally created the article. Someone another 01:50, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Game progression with the Chapters section[edit]

I fixed some spelling errors because it was bugging me. But as I read through the section I feel that it's too detailed, can somebody make it more concise(and fix spelling mistakes along the way)? I haven't started playing this game yet so I can't edit it myself. 202.53.199.23 (talk) 02:59, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marriage System[edit]

I just added the Marriage System update to the "Features" subtitle. It might need more information. MK Emaster (talk) 10:12, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a picture[edit]

I think this article needs a good picture. at least a small picture showing how the graphics are. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.54.155 (talk) 12:31, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]