Talk:Rodrigue Tremblay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

This article might have been written by Tremblay himself or an admirer. Although the works of Tremblay are considerable and well-respected, the neutrality of the article should be double-checked.

I've removed sentences that were clearly boasting and fixed the info box. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.56.154.152 (talk) 14:40, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article still doesn't adhere to a neutral point of view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.59.237.152 (talk) 03:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Rodrigue Tremblay/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

There seems to be a misunderstanding regarding the deletion of a photo I posted on the following entry

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodrigue_Tremblay

File:Rodrigue TREMBLAY.jpg Rodrigue Tremblay, Université de Montréal.

I, Carole Jean, is the owner of this photo. Why is it not accepted? What's the problem?

Most sincerely.

Carole Jean

Last edited at 01:40, 8 January 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 04:47, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Reference style[edit]

I added the tag, since some text appears to have been copied from another location that used another referencing system, or uses an ad-hoc numbering system. There is a reflist, but that is also unconventional and is not numbered, meaning that anyone who will clean this mess will need to do a lot of work to conciliate them... —PaleoNeonate – 19:24, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global Research[edit]

It is mentioned in the article but it is unclear if it really is the conspiracy theories and foreign propaganda Canadian website. The text match is how I found this article, —PaleoNeonate – 19:27, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]