Talk:Porcelain/Archives/2020

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Porcelain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111203202942/http://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/ceramics/pages/subcategory.asp?subcat_id=727&subcat_name=St+James%27s+%28Charles+Gouyn%29 to http://www.museumoflondon.org.uk/ceramics/pages/subcategory.asp?subcat_id=727&subcat_name=St+James%27s+%28Charles+Gouyn%29
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160713063054/http://www.maghsoudgroup.net/landing/index_en.html to http://www.maghsoudgroup.net/landing/index_en.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061124110833/http://manufacturedesevres.culture.gouv.fr/site.php?type=P&id=20 to http://manufacturedesevres.culture.gouv.fr/site.php?type=P&id=20

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:39, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Porcelain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120204072816/http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highlights/highlight_objects/pe_mla/b/bow_porcelain_bowl,_painted_by.aspx to https://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highlights/highlight_objects/pe_mla/b/bow_porcelain_bowl,_painted_by.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061124110833/http://manufacturedesevres.culture.gouv.fr/site.php?type=P&id=20 to http://manufacturedesevres.culture.gouv.fr/site.php?type=P&id=20
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051210070949/http://www.artlex.com/ArtLex/p/porcelain.html to http://www.artlex.com/ArtLex/p/porcelain.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:28, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Tough issue

I don't want to get into an edit war. See last few revisions for background.

The article was clearly saying that porcelain is relatively tough among ceramics. Which it is.

Please try to avoid personal attacks on other editors, even if we disagree. IAmNitpicking (talk) 22:45, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Yes, I'm not sure what "tough" as opposed to "strong" means in material science terms, but it fine to call it either, within a pottery context. Calling it both is probably not necessary. Johnbod (talk) 22:56, 17 November 2020 (UTC)