Talk:Operation All Clear/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 23:21, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Will start review now.--Dom497 (talk) 23:21, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lead is way to short. Expand it so that it covers the basics of the entire article.

The entire "Background" section needs to be re-written. The section reads as a "list". Re-write the section using full paragraphs.

Personally I'm not a fan of sections being only a list (aka, the "Operations" section). I would suggest merging the list into paragraphs, just like what I said for the "Background" section.

AustralianRupert left a really good batch of comments on the article talk page and I agree with all of his points. Take a look at his comments and address them please (his last point regarding the images isn't a concern of mine though).

@Catlemur: I'm going to stop reviewing right now. Given that most of the article needs to be re-written, I probably should fail it but I'll give you 7 days to address both my comments and the comments by AustralianRupert before continuing the review further.--Dom497 (talk) 21:28, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your hard work.The timing of this review is quite unfortunate, I am really busy with chores, study issues e.t.c., so I will be only be doing no brainer edits in the coming months.--Catlemur (talk) 14:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Catlemur: I'll leave the review open until Tuesday just in case you magically find the time. :) --Dom497 (talk) 22:34, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Somehow forgot about this....closing now.--Dom497 (talk) 01:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]