Talk:No. 202 Squadron RAF

Military history: Aviation / British / European / World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Model inaccuracy?[edit]

This was posted on the Helpdesk:

"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Sea.king.northdevon.arp.750pix.jpg The above picture is of a Mk3a Sea King, not a Mk3. It is therfore not appropriate to have it linked to an article on 202 Sqn, RAF (as at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No._202_Squadron_RAF) as they do not operate that aircraft type - they operate the Mk3. Yours, Jon Owen"

Is he correct? Do the captions and info in this article need to be fixed? --maru (talk) contribs 17:38, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's definitely an aircraft of 22 Sqn - note the serial number, and then look at [1] where you can see the squadron badge on the same helicopter. He's right that it seems to be incorrect to use it for 202 Squadron, though - I assume someone just added a picture of a Sea King without checking the specific unit. Shimgray | talk | 21:27, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on No. 202 Squadron RAF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:18, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]