Talk:Nino Surguladze

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

untitled[edit]

ParideVezzoso (talk) 16:06, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some thoughts[edit]

On September 26 the user with an IP address 94.43.181.153 made a series of modifications to the Wiki entry on Nino Surguladze. I undid all of his/her changes for the following reasons:

  • 1) For an encyclopedia article there is no need to list every single conductor that Surguladze performed with, or every single concert she took part in.
  • 2) Additions were not documented.
  • 3) Promotional language was used.
  • 4) No links to Facebook pages and the likes.
  • 5) Numerous spelling or grammatical mistakes were introduced.

Let us improve the Surguladze entry together, respecting the Wiki guidelines and other people's work. Thank you. ParideVezzoso (talk) 16:43, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree with you. The additions were very poor and violated numerous guidelines. I have reverted them. The 2 IPs which have engaged in this activity are both based in Tbilisi. Users 188.92.209.131 (talk · contribs) and 94.100.224.24 (talk · contribs), please discuss your proposed edits on this talk page. All inappropriate additions and removals will be reverted. Voceditenore (talk) 10:06, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate edits[edit]

The addition of the Facebook page is permissible if that is her sole official web page. The removal of her year of birth is also acceptable but quite silly since her full date of birth is published by the BBC and elsewhere. What is not acceptable is adding sentences like this:

Foundation invited a lot of international stars to partisipate in the benefit Concerts and more than 15 children's health and precious lifes where saved.

It written in terrible English with incorrect grammar, spelling, and punctuation. It is pure editorializing and has no reference whatsoever for the claim that her Foundation has saved the lives of more than 15 children.

It is pretty obvious what is going on. The subject or someone closely connected to her is using a variety of IPs to edit war this inappropriate text into the article, and in the process is seriously detracting from her image rather enhancing it. I have rewritten the sentence in grammatical English and placed the tag [citation needed] at the end. The tag will stay in the article either the sentence is either appropriately referenced or removed. Voceditenore (talk) 16:52, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since yet another IP has restored the ungrammatical sentence, removed the [citation needed] tag without supplying a reference, and pasted in a promotional, unformatted, and completely unreferenced chunk of resume, I have reported the article to Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Voceditenore (talk) 17:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Voceditenore. I accidentally decided to check Surguladze's Facebook page and saw that the Surguladze article on Wiki was linked from there on September 26. So either these recent edits were done by her (or her professional associate), or by an over-zealous fan (based on the number of likes, Surguladze seems to have quite a following on Facebook), whose reaction was triggered by the link posted on Surguladze's Facebook page. Be it as it may, the results are lamentable. ParideVezzoso (talk) 18:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yet more inappropriate edits[edit]

I have just reverted wholesale re-addition of repetitious, promotional laundry lists filled with inappropriate inline external links, poorly formatted, poorly punctuated, and devoid of references. User:Marbelwer, please do not do this again. If you wish to expand the article, do it gradually, sentence-by-sentence, referencing it appropriately, and writing in a neutral encyclopedic tone and style. If you have any affiliation whatsoever with the subject please read this page for guidance when editing under these circumstances. Voceditenore (talk) 08:59, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://ninosurguladze.com/bio/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 17:23, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note that even if permission were received, this completely unreferenced material is blatantly promotional and lacking in encyclopedic style and tone. It would still require heavy editing to bring it into line with our Manual of Style and key principles of Neutral point of view and Verifiability.Voceditenore (talk) 17:23, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 October 2018[edit]

I am the editor (and owner) of Mrs. Surguladzes Webpages and edit additional most of ther public web appereances. So I need access to her Wikipedia enty to keep it up to date Florianborlein (talk) 12:03, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Your request is blank or it only consists of a vague request for editing permission. It is not possible for individual users to be granted permission to edit a semi-protected page; however, you can do one of the following:
  • If you have an account, you will be able to edit this page four days after account registration if you make at least 10 constructive edits to other pages.
  • If you do not have an account, you can create one by clicking the Login/Create account link at the top right corner of the page and following the instructions there. Once your account is created and you meet four day/ten edit requirements you will be able to edit this page.
  • You can request unprotection of this page by asking the administrator who protected it. Instructions on how to do this are at WP:UNPROTECT. A page will only be unprotected if you provide a valid rationale that addresses the original reason for protection.
  • You can provide a specific request to edit the page in "change X to Y" format on this talk page and an editor who is not blocked from editing will determine if the requested edit is appropriate. —KuyaBriBriTalk 16:48, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Florianborlein, if you are referring to the repeated attempts by an IP (you?) to overwrite this article with material that is both a copyright violation and blatantly promotional, please read very carefully the section above, "Copyright problem removed". Voceditenore (talk) 17:43, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]