Talk:National Electrical Safety Code

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article seems to be written as an advertisement although perhaps if it weren’t for the person who wrote it with that motive we’d have nothing here.[edit]

I think there’s a lot that should be deleted in this article. For instance the whole thing on other similar publications, where it says that the handbook is a great book for today’s professional, and then where it mentions that the publishers of the NESC also offer classes on how to follow the NESC really seems to be more of a commercial advertisement than anything else. I think some of this should be stricken and better content provided PaupaZit (talk) 03:07, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Probably. There's a lot that should be included like the different editions, publication cycle, who has adopted what, and if anyone was so bold as to write out summary changes it would've been a huge boon for this poor project engineer. 172.86.40.10 (talk) 17:48, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]