Talk:Montemagno, Piedmont

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

On 19 December 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Montemagno. The result of the discussion was not moved.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Montemagno, Piedmont. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130112021754/http://archivio.lastampa.it/LaStampaArchivio/main/History/tmpl_viewObj.jsp?objid=8589065 to http://archivio.lastampa.it/LaStampaArchivio/main/History/tmpl_viewObj.jsp?objid=8589065

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:43, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 19 December 2021[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 16:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Montemagno, Piedmont → Montemagno
Montemagno → Montemagno (disambiguation)

Montemagno now is reserved to the disambiguation, but Montemagno, Piedmont, a municipality is more important than the frazione Montemagno, Pisa. For now there are olny two article. In the "beginning" was like this ;-) MrKeefeJohn (talk) 19:21, 19 December 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. Favonian (talk) 11:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. Jerm (talk) 21:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)— Relisting. -- Aervanath (talk) 20:31, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. We should have a third article at Montemagno, Lucca, and there appears to be no primary topic. Andrewa (talk) 17:32, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Montemagno, Lucca doesn't exist yet also in the Italian wiki. Anyway it's small village, frazione of Camaiore. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 16:48, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And there is also a 4th one in Quarrata. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
it:Montemagno (Quarrata), the third village. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 19:26, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
All of which makes it even less likely that there is a primary topic. It's not impossible, but we would need more evidence of it before we could move the DAB away from the base name as proposed. So no change of !vote. Andrewa (talk) 06:40, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
For me it's not mandatory to move this voice, but if the opposition to this request is "Somedays maybe we will have articles of some small villages, so we will discuss if a Comune is more rilevant than Frazione and decide it" it sounds strange for me. Anyway it's not so important. MrKeefeJohn (talk) 13:04, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This place is the primary topic on the Italian Wikipedia: it:Montemagno. What things do we do differently here? – Uanfala (talk) 01:24, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Afaik, other language wikis seem to have different policies, but I did notify Wikiproject Italy under the hope that somebody from there might know more. ASUKITE 17:31, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Italy has been notified of this discussion. ASUKITE 17:30, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose all 3 places called Montemagno seem to me largely irrelevant. This Montemagno barely has 1,203 inhabitants. Super Ψ Dro 18:04, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. All pretty insignificant. No primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.