Talk:Lungmen Nuclear Power Plant

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lungmen Nuclear Power Plant article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Electrical engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taiwan Mid‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Legislative violence#Republic of China (Taiwan)|a scuffle]] The anchor (#Republic of China (Taiwan)) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Referendum[edit]

I found an editorial which provides some more background for the Taiwan Referendum Act (公民投票法). Granted, Taipei Times is a pan-Green news source (pro-DPP) but they've been very passionate about nuclear power in Taiwan in general, and have lots of interesting articles on the subject. Now to try to cobble together a good article on the Referendum Act ... Lin, Yu Hsiung (March 21, 2013). "Editorial: Formulating referendum questions". Taipei Times. Retrieved November 25, 2014. -- Mliu92 (talk) 22:17, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Company of design[edit]

Is this a Toshiba or a Hitachi ABWR? Ottawakismet (talk) 00:37, 16 January 2014 (UTC) Actually, I think the ABWR is both GE / Hitachi and Toshiba. Ottawakismet (talk) 00:57, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning of operations[edit]

Given the photo that is included in this entry (dated March 2006), how could a reasonable person conclude that Unit 1 would be operational by the Summer of 2006? 67.63.236.162 (talk) 20:45, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The date state as beginning of operations is summer 2008, not 2006. 192.88.212.43 (talk) 21:06, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Out of date[edit]

The info about "trial operation in 2010, comercial in December 2011" was added in 2009. So, has the reactor gone critical? What is the plan now?ospalh (talk) 12:15, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality[edit]

"The authority Atomic Energy Council is also angry about the terrible construction. However, Taiwan Power Co. still believes that they can construct a safe nuclear power plant.[citation needed]"

I consider this section not being neutral and maybe not that correct English either. I'm not a native speaker so I hope someone else can look at this. --Freediving-beava (talk) 12:56, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Further issues with neutrality are in this section: Taiwan Power Co. did not buy the nuclear power plant from an experienced company.[clarification needed] Instead, the company bought the blueprints and some key components, then subcontracted and integrated the power plant by itself. It is as unreliable as an "airline building an airliner".[citation needed] Worse yet, Taiwan Power Co. bought the newest version of blueprints with revolutionary changes and more mistakes[clarification needed][citation needed], subcontracts to some stupid and corrupt subcontractors[citation needed], very few people understand the English instructions in the construction site, construction management is terrible[citation needed]; which means many unreliable, inexperienced contractors are trying to construct, modify and integrate an unprecedented[clarification needed], very complex nuclear power plant. As the result, there are many fatal[clarification needed] and stupid mistakes in the construction site. The projections have been surpassed, the project has gone overbudget and the date for the beginning of plant operations has been repeatedly delayed. In contrast, the old nuclear power plants in Taiwan are much more safe and reliable than Longmen." Words like "stupid", "fatal mistakes" need further explanation, otherwise they show bias. Why is is stupid? The management is terrible, why? prove it. It seems like the passage is written as protest. Ive rewritten the paragraph to improve the flow of the sentences, and the grammar, but I have not changed the content fundamentally. I would invite another editor to provide some more links to justify some of the content. Ottawakismet (talk) 15:40, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.power-technology.com/projects/lungmen/
Triggered by \bpower-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 09:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 20:42, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]