This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
"Registered Historic ____" is nowhere used by the National Register of Historic Places or National Park Service. It is a wiki-term created several years back by misinformed participants in WikiProject National Register of Historic Places. It has been removed from nearly all other places where it exists in favor of "National Register of Historic Places listings in ___" and the like. As such, this page should be moved back to the correct title of the NRHP document under which the places are all grouped, the name of the Multiple Property Submission.--Dudemanfellabra (talk) 06:17, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Were all of these listed part of the MPS?--Yaksar(let's chat) 06:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Wordy, but accurate. They aren't all part of the MPS, just the ones in the bottom section. In hindsight, I shouldn't have created the page under that name. It probably should be moved to the longer title. --Ebyabe (talk) 16:47, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, no worries. I'll move it to the longer name, but you're more than welcome to change it if you can think of a better one; you're probably more experience than I am in regards to naming these sorts of articles.--Yaksar(let's chat) 18:17, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]