Talk:Kh-28

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / European / Middle East / Polish / Russian & Soviet

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	European military history task force
	Middle Eastern military history task force
	Polish military history task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

Infobox data[edit]

If any of the values from the infobox are converted from metric to standard, they don't match.
720 kg = 1585 lb / 630 lb = 286 Kg
5970 mm = 19 ft, 4 in / 8 ft 2 in = 2515 mm

I have no idea which set of values is the correct one... Diego bf109 (talk) 11:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now sorted by the rewrite - the convert template makes things a lot easier! :-) Although different sources give different numbers, I have a feeling that there may have been a "stretch" or "shrink" to the fuselage at some point to either increase range or reduce weight, but can't find any hard evidence of that. You weren't to know I've been working my way through all the Soviet AGMs, this was next-but-one on the list when you posted.... Le Deluge (talk) 02:55, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kh-28. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080718051852/http://www.gulflink.osd.mil:80/irfna/irfna_sec04.htm to http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/irfna/irfna_sec04.htm#3.%20Air%20Force%20EOD%20Specialist’s%20IRFNA%20Burn

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:46, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistency[edit]

In the first part of the article the missile is said to still be in use but not by Russia. However, at the end Russia is listed as a current operator.150.227.15.253 (talk) 13:55, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]