Talk:Kevin Zeese

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

POV[edit]

This page is cleary sided in favor of Zeese, calling his campaign "unique in Maryland history" etc. --tomf688{talk} 20:09, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've given the article a neutral POV at this point, but I'm relatively new to this practice and so didn't want to remove the tag. I personally don't even know who Zeese is, but linked here from the community portal for something to do.
I also considerably altered and cleaned up the article, and removed the "cleanup" tag as I think it looks quite good now. I did tag it for lack of references as well. - Dharmabum420 07:00, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify, I understand that Zeese's campaign is unique in Maryland history in that he will attempt to appear three times on the ballot as the Green, Libertarian and Populist candidate. The article looks fine w.r.t. NPOV; I'll remove the tag. Lafuerzasindical 17:16, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Added this page to the 2006 Maryland elections category. robbblack 15:59, 25, January 2006

Don't delete this page[edit]

Someone has suggested deleting this page. The page is accurate. The subject, Kevin Zeese, is running for United States Senate. Many people will see his name on bumper stickers or lawn signs, or a reference to him in a news account, and want to learn more, and will naturally come to Wikipedia. Zeese is not someone who simply announced a political candidacy as an act of vanity. Zeese is a public figure and a person of public interest. He is a lawyer who has litigated important cases. He is a public intellectual whose commentary is regularly published in a wide variety of media.

The suggestion that his wikipedia page be deleted smells of an effort to limit the ability of the interested public in learning more about a figure who is articulately and effectively challengig the political establishment.—Preceding unsigned comment added by EricSterling (talk • contribs)

Auto, OR, and POV issues from the AfD[edit]

I see the article is back from the dead... I still have the concerns (WP:AUTO, WP:OR, and WP:POV for your reference) from the AfD, specifically, that the IPs of the subject, his son, and some coworkers were revealed. The history shows:

— RevRagnarok Talk Contrib Reverts 16:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC) (Who, coincidentally, is a Libertarian from Maryland who was accused of being part of a left wing conspiracy in the AfD)[reply]

Then perhaps you should start editing to remove uncitable claims and otherwise improve the article yourself until your concerns are eased. Conspiracy babble doesn't really get us anywhere. Fearwig 21:44, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fearwig, you may be misunderstanding RR, who changed his vote to Keep in the original AfD, and is saying that he was accused of being part of a conspiracy, not that that a conspiracy existed. I think we're all agreed ("we" being the reasonable folks here at the discussion) that the article severely lacks sourcing, and that opens all sorts of possibilities of inappropriate content. On the other hand, while the list of things Zeese has done is lengthy, none of them are that grandiose (and I removed one claim, discussed below, for lack of proof, earlier today).
Unfortunately, we may all be busy people who have higher priorities than chasing down sources and doing copyedist of what, to be blunt, probably isn't really that important an article. John Broughton 00:31, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The page is back?[edit]

Why was the AfD decision overturned? What is DRV? Surely with ongoing POV concerns the redirect should be re-enabled? BlueValour 16:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See the 'back from the dead' link above. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib Reverts 16:58, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
As I mentioned to BlueValour, changing a redirect back into an article is a normal editorial decision that doesn't require any administrator action. For example, if this article were deleted, an administrator is required to undelete the article. Since I merely redirected the article, any editor can come along, go to the article history, and restore the article. For the record, I have no problem with this, because a redirect is just a specific "Keep" action. This talk page would actually be a better way to determine overall consensus for the article as to whether it should be kept or redirected. AfD is to determine whether an article is deleted or not deleted. --Deathphoenix ʕ 17:26, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am surprised that as the AfD proposer I was not alerted to this DRV so I could take part in the debate. BlueValour 17:35, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well, DRV is a review of the closing admin's actions. Even the closing admin often isn't notified of these things. I started notifying admins a little while back, but I don't think it's necessary to notify the AfD nominator, as the DRV is a review of the AfD closure, not the nomination itself. --Deathphoenix ʕ 14:20, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect or article?[edit]

I made a point in both the initial AfD and the subsequent review that I don't believe have been responded to and that goes to the heart of the matter. (To be more exact, it was responded to, but with what turned out to be a mistaken argument.) Perhaps those who believe a redirect is appropriate could comment on it? John Broughton 19:14, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And the point was? trialsanderrors 11:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm ... that would explain why no one responded to it, here. The point was that a google search on Kevin Zeese returns over 200,000 results; since he's a minor candidate, these are obviously mostly about the other parts of his career. 200,000 ghits is a pretty strong indicator of notability. John Broughton 16:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editing down the article[edit]

I trimmed down the political career section to an acceptable level. The middle part needs trimming too and the intro line should probably be about his career in drugs. If we can't get this to stick because of POV pushing a second AfD might be in order. Also, three of the links were dead. ~ trialsanderrors 11:08, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I put the section back, and more. There is now a total of ONE paragraph (six lines) that talks about what his campaign is about (issues/positions). That is the absolute minimum (in my opinion) needed for a reader to get a sense of what he is arguing for. It would be POV only if there were a LOT more.
The rest of the section on his political career consists of one paragraph discussing his involvement in several campaigns, and two paragraphs about the process of getting on the ballot in the 2006. All of the rest of the section is clearly factual, brief, and NPOV.
There is no question that the article is unbalanced (political career versus everything else). But the solution is to add more about the rest of his life, NOT to shorten the political section. In other words, an unbalanced article with the right amount of info about one thing and too little about another is preferable to a balanced article with too little information about everything. For the former, editors can easily add more. For the latter, an editor who wants to add more would, in theory, have to add to all aspects of the subject to avoid imbalance, which is VERY demanding.
Also, the citypaper link was dead because of an extra / at the end. I'm moving it to the campaign article.
Finally, the "main" link to the campaign article seems a bit odd because, in fact, there is less about Zeese there than in his article. But I'm not willing to get into a fight in the campaign article about the "right" amount of coverage for a minor party candidate; and the campaign article DOES contain more info on the campaign than in the Zeese article. So I believe the link should be left as is - this is the format for the candidates in all of the other 33 Senate races this year (most of which I've edited). John Broughton 16:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Broughton's statements in part, but there's more to it than that--the political is really more important, at least right now. Wikipedians tend too much to the biographical, anecdotal, not enough to the issues, when it comes to covering politicians past and present. That doesn't mean you should strip the biogrpahical information, as it's quite useful, but you definitely shouldn't remove the political information just to make it look "balanced"! As a candidate for US Senate (even one unlikely to win), it makes sense that a great deal of the article would cover his politics and his participation in the race in general. I could see the information being scaled back after November, but until then it is very, very useful, more useful than anything else in the article to most people who would put Kevin Zeese into the search field.
More importantly, there is rarely such a thing as "too much information" about a candidate for a national office, even a third party candidate, and I usually find it very difficult to believe absolute political neutrality in the motivations of those who make that claim. I'm not a Zeese supporter, but ready access to information about candidates is part of a healthy democracy. Wikipedia is a great forum for "objective" candidate information (tentative statement), something that's very hard to find otherwise--in that sense it provides a great service. Certainly this is a better use of Wikipedia than a great, great number of the articles out there (see: List of fictional universes, List of left-handed people whose names include the letter "r", ad nauseam), and I think one should be damned hard-pressed to prove why such an article shouldn't exist, or why it should have perfectly useful information stripped from it. Excuse my rant, but it seems there are a number of people who think just that. Fearwig 21:42, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tulia story[edit]

I can't find any sources for Zeese's involvement in the Tulia story. The story itself has been extensively covered, but looking at major and regional news sources, I found only one mention of Zeese in passing, bottom of the article. Some of the drug war protesters met with representatives for Bush before the conference, said Kevin Zeese, president of Common Sense for Drug Policy. Zeese said he hopes it will initiate a prompt dialogue with Bush, especially as the presidential election nears. Austin American-Statesman (Texas)September 30, 2000. I don't know how that qualifies as "bringing national attention to". Was he a lawyer for the defense? ~ trialsanderrors 18:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the text, based on your research. At this point, it's up to someone else who wants to add the info back into the article to provide a source for it. John Broughton 16:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC)independence mean sto be[reply]

AfD template[edit]

It is essential that this remains at the top of the page since this is where editors would check for it if, for example, they decide to renominate this article. This is consistent with all other AfD results. BlueValour 17:14, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks. I've added information so that editors who are considering renominating the article for deletion can see the full results of the process. John Broughton 19:50, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nice move! BlueValour 20:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal Life[edit]

Maybe we should put some stuff about his personal life up here? I think it is important, being that he left his first wife (and kids) for another woman, who he subsequently left for a third woman a few years later. Do you all think that's relevant? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Squiems (talk • contribs) 13:51, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can only use WP:RS about such things. Doubt it's that notable from WP:RS. CarolMooreDC (talk) 15:17, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.examiner.com/a-315327~Nader_endorses_Zeese_for_Senate.html
    Triggered by (?<=[/@.])examiner\.com(?:[:/?\x{23}]|$) on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please Delete This Page[edit]

This person is not notable by Wikipedia standards. Why is he on here? Someone above advocated that he stay on, but this appears to be a fan or a loved one who has a personal relationship with the subject. Leonard chance (talk) 22:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Kevin Zeese. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:50, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kevin Zeese. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kevin Zeese. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:40, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protection of the Venezuelan Embassy in Washington DC[edit]

The article should make some mention of his work in protecting the Venezuelan Embassy in Washington DC.

Son of eugene (talk) 01:33, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Zeese passed away, waiting for WP:RS[edit]

I was closely connected with Kevin Zeese, so I'll refrain from editing his page, but he passed away from heart attack. Will post news sources here, once they're published.


References[edit]

  1. As I understand it, Zeese's run wasn't endorsed by the national Populist party but the Maryland Populist Party. Couldn't find a Wikipedia page for it; if there is one, the reference should be linked to it.
  2. Much of Zeese's work was around PopularResistance.org. I didn't see any reference to that.

Khargushoghli (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:52, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kevin_Zeese&oldid=1208898713"