This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Neither of those images of the jug should be on commons, as the pd-old doesn't extend to photos of 3D artworks. A new copyright is created for the photographer of 3D works because it is believed that some creativity is involved in the choice of angle and lighting. You could move one of them over here and claim it under fair use. Yomanganitalk 11:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Your a real budel of joy. Neither image is very strong, the flow of dripping blood is lost in both, the present lead img has whatever background v crudely photoshopped out, and there is too much refelction in the second. I have a very good photo from the Cachin book, but, alas, no scanner. Ceoil (talk) 22:45, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There are loads of similar images on Commons. So long as it's plainly a "faithful" repro, no one pays attention very much. 31.6.19.201 (talk) 15:11, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
