Talk:Joseph Kappen

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

British crime (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject British crime, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.British crimeWikipedia:WikiProject British crimeTemplate:WikiProject British crimeBritish crime articles

Crime and Criminal Biography: Serial, mass, and spree killers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Serial Killer task force (assessed as Low-importance).

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales High‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Police initially convicted wrong men re Lynette White[edit]

It should be routinely stated that completely innocent men were initially convicted. The fact that Wikipedia usually doesn't do it in case like this article display the "Patton 360/The Bill" nature of thinking (by police and by osmosis Wikipedia writers).

It is countered by this abstract concept - that fingerprints and DNA etc don't make the police get it right - they stop the police from getting it wrong - and those 2 concepts ARE different.

i.e. all police assertions made in court cases based on one set of evidence should always be vindicated by later evidence developments - the previous evidence method is PROVED bogus or fallible otherwise.

Psychological Profiling is probably the best known example of that - later DNA evidence shows about a 50/50 success rate with it - so no better than tossing a coin.

(e.g. I've long argued for a Wikipedia article list of crime cases where Psychological Profilers swore blind to police and courts etc that is was person A who was then convicted when it later turned out it was person B proved by later DNA etc - as with Colin Stagg and Richard Jewel etc - how about it Wikipedia?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.210.174 (talk) 14:28, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]