Talk:Hurricane Ignacio (1985)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleHurricane Ignacio (1985) was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 3, 2013Good article nomineeListed
May 25, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hurricane Ignacio (1985)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TheAustinMan (talk · contribs) 15:58, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

  • Infobox says 130 mph. Did you mean 135?
  • You could link 'rapidly intensified' to rapid deepening.
  • If you say "As fast as it strengthened," you don't have to say it weakened just as rapidly, because you already state that.
  • "Ignacio was downgraded into a tropical storm while passing south of Hawaii." When?
  • "...however, the watch was dropped when Ignacio weakened. However, Ignacio still brought high waves and light rainfall to the islands." You use however twice. You should find an alternative if possible.

Meteorological history[edit]

  • "on July 21 1,623 mi (2,612 km)" I think you should add a comma after 21.
    • No, but there should be a while located in here, which I added. YE Pacific Hurricane 16:22, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Intensifying further west than normal[2]" comma before reference.
  • "Based on this, the CPHC upgraded Ignacio into hurricane status..." I think into → to
  • "Continuing to rapidly intensify, Hurricane Ignacio moved west-northwest at 10 mph (16 km/h). Ignacio was upgraded into Category 2 status on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale (SSHS)." I think you could combine the two sentences, and state when Ignacio was upgraded.
  • Link Hurricane Hunter
  • "The hurricane held peak intensity for several hours, however, an upper trough northwest of the Hawaiian Islands was gradually approaching Ignacio." If you're starting a new paragraph, a good rule of thumb is to include the time the stated fact happened, regardless of whether or not it was stated at the end of the last.
  • "a mjaor hurricane" spellcheck
  • "Air Force aircraft" Whose Air Force?
  • "The hurricane resumed its westerly course..." I don't see anywhere else in the MH where a different course was taken or disrupted.
  • "While passing south of the island chain..." Since this is in a new paragraph, what island chain?
  • Can you provide any times for the events stated in the MH?

Preparations and impact[edit]

  • "and the Big Island" I don't think you need 'the'
  • "that lead to the beaches" lead → led

References and external links[edit]

  • Would Reference #9 have any link?
    • It's in cite news, so they don't need links! But, I made the title lowercase. YE Pacific Hurricane 16:22, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's all I have for now. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 15:58, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment[edit]

Hurricane Ignacio (1985)[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. Dylan620 (he/him • talkedits) 21:15, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a procedural delisting, as the article has been merged per consensus at Talk:1985 Pacific hurricane season#Proposed merge of Hurricane Ignacio (1985) into 1985 Pacific hurricane season. Dylan620 (he/him • talkedits) 21:14, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.