Talk:History of international law

International relations: Law Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law (assessed as Top-importance).

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

This page is renamed because it deals with [[public internatio

Missing a referencve to this internationall law, from the XIII century, writen in Catalonia.--Paco ✉ 14:49, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The piece on customary law - absence of reasoning:

The article reads in relevant part, "Before World War II, a nation would not have been considered to be bound by a rule unless it had formally agreed to be bound by it, or it was already customarily abiding by that rule. Now, however, merely consenting to an international practice is sufficient to be bound by it, without signing a treaty." This statement appears quite misleading. What I think was intended to be conveyed was that the origins of customary international law were partly restated by the ICJ in several of its decisions that appeared to dilute the then existing so-called strict requirements for the recognition of a rule as a rule of custom. The pre-post WWII position (referring to the extinguishing of the PCIJ under the League and the birth of the ICJ under the Charter) has nothing to do with custom itself. All that it can mean is the shift from the pre ICJ scenario to ICJ & after. Clarification to this effect is necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.164.130.238 (talk) 07:26, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance of this page being referenced properly? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.33.193.55 (talk) 07:44, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]