Talk:Henryk Tomaszewski (mime)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I would very much like to know from where you got the information that the great polish artist Henryk Tomaszewski has been a spy, and has even denounced his friends to the Communist Secret Police. It is an extremely grave accuse, and it should be documented. Roberta Taddei

Here are relevant sources

Henryk Tomaszewski współpracował z SB Gazeta Wyborcza
Legenda pantomimy współpracownikiem SB onet.pl Mathiasrex 14:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because these "references" are in Polish, they are not verifiable, so I am removing them. --Horse Badorties 00:20, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of course those references are verifiable. Restoring. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:33, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed there is nothing at all wrong with foreign-language sources generally, even if English sources are preferred when available. Rejecting the validity of a text particularly because it is in Polish, on the other hand, is unacceptable. By the way, the "second" source is actually the same document as the first, except that it requires subscription access. I have accordingly deleted it as superfluous. There were also some dubious inferences in the claim, which seemed to require some expansion as well. It appears to be a very interesting case, and certainly well worth including in this article.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 16:41, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]