Talk:Fairchild v. Hughes
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
"Case"[edit]
Super technical here -- this is not a "case." Standing jurisprudence comes from the constitution referring to "cases and controversies." The courts can only decide those two things. If it is a case or a controversy, there is standing. Since there is no standing here, there is no case or controversy, and... ideally, this should not be described as a case.
Although I assume nobody anywhere cares. Daniel J. Hakimi (talk) 01:37, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- @DanHakimi: Nothing wrong with using a more correct wording... What word would be more precise? lawsuit? controversy? --2601:646:8D81:EEC:C963:26B2:22CC:AB55 (talk) 19:33, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- PS: Please feel free to make the improvement to the article, I can't imagine it would be controversial, and WP:BRD is how we roll. --2601:646:8D81:EEC:C963:26B2:22CC:AB55 (talk) 23:51, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class U.S. Supreme Court articles
- Low-importance U.S. Supreme Court articles
- WikiProject SCOTUS articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class Women's History articles
- Low-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles