This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Derventio Brigantum is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
I'm not saying Derventio isn't actually 18 miles from the main site at Eboracum, but it's certainly not what the itinerary lists and we should address that. — LlywelynII 04:39, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think that number was taken form the Ottaway, Roman York text. Taking an NGR at the principiae of Eboracum(SE 60325 52182) and Malton (SE 79139 71738), gives a linear distance of 27.14km = 16miles, 1520yds; which, I concede, is just over an imperial mile short of the advertised distance. I suspect Ottaway was using modern site-to-site with a different central reference point. I'd be hugely sceptical of using the Itinery as a basis for measurement, given its issues. Zakhx150 (talk) 23:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]