Talk:Day of Private Reflection

	Northern Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Troubles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in limited circumstances)
Neutrality: All editors on Troubles-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as outside opinions.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Article history[edit]

This was created as a copyvio of http://www.dayofreflection.com/about_the_day.html . It looks likely to be notable, so I've stripped out all the copyright material and replaced with a stub. It now needs third-party references and substantial expansion. Gonzonoir (talk) 15:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi there, I created this page, but am new to the wikipedic and would request some help.

Please note that

The Day is not a national holiday - it has relevance to the Irish Diaspora, the United Kingdom, and a variety of international occurences that are part of the history of the conflict in and about Northern Ireland. this includes actions throughout Europe, Africa, and North America.

It has recently been highlighted in a UK Governemnt commissioned report as being of significant importance in securing peace with regard to the conflict. This has international resonance as many see the Northern ireland peace process as being of relevance to other conflict scenarios, and are keen to consider best practices that might be relevant in local context.

-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anguslambkin (talk • contribs) 16:20, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK for starters you have a conflict of interest with the topic. Secondly by "national" holiday I mean it's celebration seems to be limited to Northern Ireland, and it's notability limited because of that. It doesn't help it's only happened once. You might claim that others see it as relevant, but without citations from reliable sources any claim is meaningless. Linking and quoting from the report would be a good first start, along with proof of international "celebration". --Blowdart | ^talk 16:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your comment is noted, has taken place twice, and is scheduled to take place again this year. Conflict in NI spread all over, exiles still live abroad, and the event attempts to be all inclusive. Does the fact that it is relevant to the Republic of Ireland, and Britain, not make it more notable. people died all over the world as a result of the conflict. The experience of the conflict is now touted globally to other conflict affected regions. I think i need to work out how to do citations, but this is good, I would clearly be lost if I did this alone

What's the story, some edits onto the page are not appearing - any ideas —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anguslambkin (talk • contribs) 12:45, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Day of Private Reflection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090205014901/http://www.cgpni.org:80/fs/doc/Consultative%20Group%20on%20the%20Past%20Full%20Report.pdf to http://www.cgpni.org/fs/doc/Consultative%20Group%20on%20the%20Past%20Full%20Report.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Day of Private Reflection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]