Talk:Dave and Steve's Video Game Explosion

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Jack Marston (Red Dead) (5 participants)
Joshua Tomar (5 participants)
Juhani (Star Wars) (3 participants)
Starwing Paradox (2 participants)
Pit (Kid Icarus) (13 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (nom)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (nom)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (nom)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Fallout Online (start)
Donkey Kong (start)
Horizon Forbidden West (start)
Surround (video game) (start)
AirCars (start)
Laura Matsuda (start)
The Completionist (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

I'm not certain why the warnings are still here considering that source articles are listed already. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.114.117 (talk • contribs) 00:42, November 29, 2006

I agree. Valrith, please comment on why the tags cannot be removed. Vessels42 17:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I've moved the unref tag down to a position just above paragraph 3, which is my sole remaining major complaint about the article -- Everything2 is not a reliable source. The orphan tag, imo, should remain because there is very little linking to here; however, if more than one editor disagrees, I wouldn't argue over its removal. I still don't think this show is sufficiently notable for an article, however, so I would argue that the notability tag should stay. Valrith 01:20, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I would argue for notability in the sense that this show was more successful than plenty of shows with pages on Wikipedia; a quick glance at List of television programs by letter yields, e.g. AlfTales, not to mention that the creators are writers from other noteworthy shows. I am open to expanding what links here, and fixing the references. Vessels42 19:33, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- On behalf of an in agreement with Valrith and Vessels42, I have removed the PROD tag as suggested at WP:DELETE#Proposed deletion under the line item "If you disagree". --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]