Talk:Clive Doucet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled thread[edit]

is he not a Quaker?

inaccuracy of biographical data[edit]

An inaccurate addition to this page is continually being entered: "Political party: Officially not partisan, but has supported the New Democratic Party." This has been added by Earl Andrew, and has been reverted by a number of people (including once by me) as it is inaccurate, but Earl Andrew has added it back a number of times. Orhysjones1 (talk) 18:35, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the party material for now. Here is the material and citation: Officially not partisan, but has supported the New Democratic Party. [1]


Can folks please discuss this here? Thanks, --Threeafterthree (talk) 18:45, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is not inaccurate, there is a source. Please read it. Everyone knows Doucet supports the NDP. There was a previous source as well, but it wasn't a good one. -- Earl Andrew - talk 19:36, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Here is another source: http://www.nupge.ca/news_2008/n19au08c.htm In addition our own article lists it: List of Ontario CCF/NDP members. The original (non official source) was [2]. I'm sure there's other offline sources as well. -- Earl Andrew - talk 19:45, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
what do others think?--Threeafterthree (talk) 14:14, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
He has been given long enough and has not commented. He's just a fly by night user. -- Earl Andrew - talk 14:21, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you talking to/about? Maybe add the "material" into the body of the article but I wouldn't put it in the info box under party, ect. --Threeafterthree (talk) 14:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't referring to you, but why not put it in the infobox? It seems rather inconsistent. -- Earl Andrew - talk 16:03, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clive Doucet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]