Talk:Cleostratus

Greece Mid‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q2. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of Oklahoma/History of Science from Antiquity to Newton (Summer 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Boyd8420 (talk) 21:29, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

There is little to work with when trying to understand who or when something was invented. In this case the star arguement and arrangement seems to be credited to Cleostratus. This view held by Dr. Forthingham only really has weight because of the limited amount of material evidence and the constant problem of translations.This reoccuring theme in the Historical study of the Sciences, has both Greek and Latin translations which could conflict with the already small amount of source material. The fact that this figure Cleostratus is at least (almost) a contempary of Thales, means not only historical reverence but also has an idea of continuation of old and possibly unprovable myths of real men. Myths transcending history. see E.J. Webb.Boyd8420 (talk) 22:39, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography[edit]

-Little to no known information about Cleostratus.

"Cleostratus of Tenedos." Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Online Academic Edition. Encyclopædia Britannica Inc., 2013. Web. <http://www.britannica.com.ezproxy.lib.ou.edu/EBchecked/topic/121258/Cleostratus-of-Tenedos>. Boyd8420 (talk) 13:38, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fotheringham J.K. “Cleostratus.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Vol. 39, (1919), pp. 164-184.

Webb E.J. “Cleostratus Redivivus”The Journal of Hellenic Studies , Vol. 41, Part 1 (1921), pp. 70-85. Published by: The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies http://www.jstor.org/stable/624797.Boyd8420 (talk) 22:29, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey User:Boyd8420 I think you have some really great sources here with some great information and I do not think it will be to difficult to put it all together and make a good informative article. Good Luck!

Bakeore (talk) 04:18, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is not a great deal of information, but what is there is sort of interesting. Once I get some pics like Noah's and more explaninations it should come together better. The good thing is that the artilce will at least be in better shape than when I found it. Boyd8420 (talk) 14:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the timeframes for inventions are difficult. I have had a lot of trouble on mine figuring out good dates for his sub designs. However, if the sources you do have right now have enough solid information, you should be good with quality over quantity. I know how you feel about being stuck with so little sources. I feel like if you can just expound on the existing article enough so that the main influence Cleostratus had is more clear, you will be alright. Nro87 (talk) 21:09, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

More to be added about the moon crater which bears Cleostratus name, simply because there is so little information on the man. Why is it necessary to credit the assimilation of the Zodiac from the east by means of Cleostratus?. Greek authority edit on the article. Someone needs to be credited for the emergence of the Greeks and their understanding of the Zodiac. Cleostraus is that person, Pliny is simply enforcing the stories not asking questions about the actual person or idea of a person.Boyd8420 (talk) 15:10, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Included picture of the Cleostratus crater from wikimedia. Larger size makes the picture and crater easier to view and also provides a more detailed layout for examining smaller craters surronding the Cleostratus, upper left hand corner. No real images of Cleostratus, except for a few Roman idealized images which were copyrighted in another country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boyd8420 (talk • contribs) 19:53, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cleostratus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060430233625/http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/0812.html to http://www.ancientlibrary.com/smith-bio/0812.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:54, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]